Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > I've changed order of initialization now. I've also removed > some debug output > for query mode to work around the issue as some information > is only queried for > debug purposes. > > I did run both, your use-case as well as a wpkg-test suite > run with 1.2.1-RC34 > which completed su

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Stefan, On 22.10.2011 17:36, Stefan Pendl wrote: Problem still persists, configuration sent privately (~3MB). Verified. Sorry for delay but it took a bit to track it down and solve it as it needs some fundamental initialization changes. The reason is that WPKG during initialization print

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > On 22.10.2011 17:23, Stefan Pendl wrote: > > There still seems to be something wrong with the package > application during a query. > > "Something" is a bit too unprecise... However I found that > /query:l did show now > the remote information as read from the settings file. This > is fix

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > On 22.10.2011 17:23, Stefan Pendl wrote: > > There still seems to be something wrong with the package > application during a query. > > "Something" is a bit too unprecise... However I found that > /query:l did show now > the remote information as read from the settings file. This > is fix

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Stefan, On 22.10.2011 17:23, Stefan Pendl wrote: There still seems to be something wrong with the package application during a query. "Something" is a bit too unprecise... However I found that /query:l did show now the remote information as read from the settings file. This is fixed in 1

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > On 22.10.2011 16:32, Stefan Pendl wrote: > > I have just checked the remote query and it works great > except for one thing. > > It seems that the queryMode does not update the host os attributes. > > Actually I found this to be likely a caching issue. All host > information are > supposed

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Stefan, On 22.10.2011 16:32, Stefan Pendl wrote: I have just checked the remote query and it works great except for one thing. It seems that the queryMode does not update the host os attributes. Actually I found this to be likely a caching issue. All host information are supposed to be sta

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > To work around this issue I've introduced a new switch called > /queryMode which > takes the "remote" attribute: /queryMode:remote > > In "remote" mode WPKG will change its behavior in some special cases: > > - WPKG reads all host attributes from the settings node (wpkg.xml) > - WPKG does

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Stefan, On 22.10.2011 13:03, Stefan Pendl wrote: You need some sleep too, don't you ;-) Sometimes yes ;) I will give the new release a whirl in my test environments. Great, Thank you! Rainer - wpkg-users mailing l

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Pendl
Hi Rainer, > > Oh, it's 3:30am now, I guess I've broken a lot in the code, > but we have SVN. > Talk to you tomorrow... > You need some sleep too, don't you ;-) I will give the new release a whirl in my test environments. --- Stefan -

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Meier
Hello again, On 22.10.2011 01:37, Rainer Meier wrote: I've implemented /query:s and /query:l to query these tags from the (l)ocal host or the (s)ettings database and print it on screen. So a reporting tool could point it to a settings file using /settings: /query:s to fetch all host attributes.

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Stefan, I've implemented /query:s and /query:l to query these tags from the (l)ocal host or the (s)ettings database and print it on screen. So a reporting tool could point it to a settings file using /settings: /query:s to fetch all host attributes. NEW: Implemented new query parameters:

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > > > Sure it would be much easier, if we could use a command > line switch for this. > > In addition we would need another command line switch, > which instructs wpkg.js to retrieve the host attributes from > the specified > > wpkg.xml file instead of the current host. > > > > Too slow >

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Stefan, On 21.10.2011 20:39, Stefan Pendl wrote: There is no easy solution for this yet. You can specify a server-side copy of the local "database" of any client for examination by using the /config: switch to a config.xml file, which only contains the "settings_file_name" and "settings_fi

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Kai, On 21.10.2011 18:14, Kai Pastor wrote: Hello, I am testing WPKG 1.2.1-RC27 and have not seen any problems. Thank you very much for your work. Great news. So far I have also used WPKG Create Report which is linked on the download page. This useful tool is not yet aware of the new fe

Re: [wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Stefan Pendl
> > So far I have also used WPKG Create Report which is linked on the > download page. This useful tool is not yet aware of the new > features and > the changes in the syntax. I guess that will take quite some > effort and > time for implementing an update to this tool. > I have been in cont

[wpkg-users] New WPKG features vs. report tool

2011-10-21 Thread Kai Pastor
Hello, I am testing WPKG 1.2.1-RC27 and have not seen any problems. Thank you very much for your work. So far I have also used WPKG Create Report which is linked on the download page. This useful tool is not yet aware of the new features and the changes in the syntax. I guess that will take