Re: [wpkg-users] Strange bug found in WPKG client

2009-04-17 Thread luca_manganelli
Rainer Meier scritti il 17/04/2009 10.12.24 > Looking at the log below I am absolutely sure that WPKG finds a DisplayName > entry within the uninstall locations which carries the string "GIMP 2.6.5". > Probably try searching further. You 're right :-) result of regfind.exe "2.6.5": \Registry

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange bug found in WPKG client

2009-04-17 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Luca, luca_mangane...@comune.trento.it wrote: > Attached the regedit screenshot. Thanks. > It is comparing the "DisplayName" entry? Yes. What I see from the screen shot is that your entry looks quite different than my GIMP installer (I am using GIMP Windows installer from

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange bug found in WPKG client

2009-04-16 Thread luca_manganelli
Rainer Meier scritti il 16/04/2009 16.15.38 > Interesting, your description looks like absolutely correct output > of WPKG if an > uninstall entry "GIMP 2.6.5" would exist. Are you 100% sure (by searching the > System registry) that souch an uninstall entry does not exist? It might not > appear w

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange bug found in WPKG client

2009-04-16 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Luca, Actually this is a "strange bug" in WPKG server (wpkg.js), and not in the client I would say. luca_mangane...@comune.trento.it wrote: > I've installed wpkg client on a machine with GIMP 2.6.4 installed and I > have the 2.6.5 package. > > The strange thing is that when I synchronize, it

[wpkg-users] Strange bug found in WPKG client

2009-04-16 Thread luca_manganelli
Hi, I've installed wpkg client on a machine with GIMP 2.6.4 installed and I have the 2.6.5 package. The strange thing is that when I synchronize, it checks this: it says that the check is right and therefore it doesn't install the 2.6.5. I use WPKG Client 1.3.6 and latest WPKG.js 1.1 M21