Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
If you are fine with hard-wiring a client-server association, then
I've remember, some past thread, that probably are well suited for the
wiki...
We have just discussed that probably the best way to lock a client to a
''server'' is to use
Hi Marco,
On 15.05.2012 09:45, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
If network 192.168.1.0/24 then SOFTWARE=\\192.168.1.x\wpkg\software
If network 192.168.2.0/24 then SOFTWARE=\\192.168.2.x\\wpkg\software
I'm a bit curious. How do you check network address with cmd? I've
googled around a bit, but...
Using
Mandi! Donny Brooks
In chel di` si favelave...
We are currently running our wpkg setup with just one central repository or
software store. However we have samba home servers for all of our
individual sections, some of which are remote offices. These remote offices
internet connection
On Monday, May 14, 2012 10:32 AM CDT, Marco Gaiarin g...@sv.lnf.it wrote:
Mandi! Donny Brooks
In chel di` si favelave...
We are currently running our wpkg setup with just one central repository or
software store. However we have samba home servers for all of our
individual
Mandi! Donny Brooks
In chel di` si favelave...
Thanks for that. So if I read correctly you actually have separate servers
for each location? Meaning you have each locations wpkg client software
pointing to their local server rather than a centralized one? Then you just
make changes to
On Monday, May 14, 2012 11:06 AM CDT, Marco Gaiarin g...@sv.lnf.it wrote:
Mandi! Donny Brooks
In chel di` si favelave...
Thanks for that. So if I read correctly you actually have separate servers
for each location? Meaning you have each locations wpkg client software
Hi Donny,
On 14.05.2012 18:14, Donny Brooks wrote:
I understand. So what I was thinking of doing with the clients still going back
to the centralized wpkg server for configs but pulling software from local
servers should work if I read correctly. I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't
mess
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:05 PM CDT, Rainer Meier r.me...@wpkg.org wrote:
Hi Donny,
On 14.05.2012 18:14, Donny Brooks wrote:
I understand. So what I was thinking of doing with the clients still going
back to the centralized wpkg server for configs but pulling software from
