Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft

Bruce/Inigo - Do you think the Transparency section in the revocation doc from Phill and David belongs in the Trust Model doc? All the best. Tim. > On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:47 PM, "Ben Wilson" wrote: > > Iñigo and Bruce, > Perhaps we should revise the Trust Model document to describe how browse

Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft

Iñigo and Bruce, Perhaps we should revise the Trust Model document to describe how browser, root store, and cryptolibrary are related? In addressing Gerv's comments, I am thinking of starting with the following "This document reviews the current processing behaviors of cryptolibraries, and the bro

Re: [wpkops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wpkops-trustmodel-02.txt

Hi Iñigo, Thank you for your responses which have provided excellent clarification. Maybe 3.2.1 needs a reference to the BRs? It's not something to get excited about so I'll leave it up to you whether you agree or not. Regards, Rob From: i-barre...@izenpe.net [mailto:i-barre...@izenp

[wpkops] Fwd: NIST Requests Comments on 2nd Draft of NISTIR 7924: Reference Certificate Policy

Saw this posted on the PKIX mail-list, thought it might be of interest here as well. Mike Jenkins NIST announces the public comment release of the second draft of Interagency Report 7924, Reference Certificate Policy . The purpose of

Re: [wpkops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wpkops-trustmodel-02.txt

Hi Rob, In your email Iñigo Barreira Responsable del Área técnica i-barre...@izenpe.net 945067705 ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts e