Lighten up David... you'll give yourself sunspots ;-).
Leo
On Friday, April 9, 2004, at 06:41 PM, David wrote:
...Sorry everyone if this is offpoint just had to get that off
my chest!
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi,
The links mouse-over (and the site) works well in Opera 7 and
Mozilla Firefox 0.8 as well as IE 6.Well these are newer browser
versions anyway.
David.
--- The Snider's Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -I just did a site redesign and wanted to get feedback. This
> site was tough
> as it had
Hello,
Yes I agree to the no-attachments/all caps policy but
I object to the use of my country of birth Nigeria as an (bad)
example viz
>You may also end up getting weighted towards
> Nigerian bank
> spam by some types of filtering packages :D
"You may end up getting weighed towards spam by some
Veine
I do this all the time in Mac. It looks as though your page is working
now with it in Mac IE5.2. It's all about floating and sizing it
properly. All Mac IE bugs are usually easy to fix. For the future IMO
you should design the layout using colored boxes and dummy text until
you know its
Hmm, that is an interesting solution. I guess I never really thought
about it, but is that what inline style is for? Style that is
considered part of the content? I guess I always just thought it was
another place to put style (if you don't need it to apply to multiple
documents) and that style
Sam Walker wrote:
Granted, the graphs are very nice. However, wouldn't this be considered
the /wrong/ way to use CSS? The graph is part of the basic information
of the page, isn't it? So it should not rely on CSS to generate it. CSS
is for styling, (X)HTML is where the content goes. It seems lik
Granted, the graphs are very nice. However, wouldn't this be considered the wrong way to use CSS? The graph is part of the basic information of the page, isn't it? So it should not rely on CSS to generate it. CSS is for styling, (X)HTML is where the content goes. It seems like the only way to do th
Hello Leo;
I had it this way before, and I have changed it back to that now, however,
if I do it this way, the cut-off in MacOS / IE 5 is even bigger (as
Zulema's screen shot in earlier reply shows) And I can't for the life of me
figure out why there is such a huge difference between the Mac an
Chris,
Add "bottom: 0;" to your page container and it will work in Safari.
#contents {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
On Thursday, April 8, 2004, at 02:21 AM, Chris Blown wrote:
Hey Mike,
Check here h
