Ted,
[WSG] off topic, but needed. are there any struts users?
I just wanted to know if there are any struts users that could answer a question for
me off the list.
Forgive me if you've already exhausted these channels, but have you
tried asking your Struts questions where they would be
Cameron
wrote:
Did we resolve whether Australian legislation has the
potential for similar effects?
Have you forgotten Sydney Olympics web site, it was 4 years ago the Human Rights
Commission awarded A$20,000 compensation in the Maguire vs. SOCOG case.
You can find it all here:
Ah, I was under the impression that that was
pertaining to Government sites.
--
Cameron
W: www.themaninblue.com
--- Nick Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cameron
wrote:
Did we resolve whether Australian legislation has
the
potential for similar effects?
Have you forgotten Sydney
The more salient question would be whether corporates can be forced to
do so in australia, as SOCOG was a government corporation. AFAIK whether
australian corporates can be forced to comply to W3C/accessibility
guidelines is untested in the courts.
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web
Cool, thanks Phillipe! That fixes it.
it is a bit the same as this problem
http://dev.l-c-n.com/safari/duplicate_float.php
I did think that I was using position:relative for a reason though...
I think it was so I could absolutely position child elements. Hmmm...
I'll have to check all the
And of course, Bruce Maguire (the guy who sued SOCOG) will be speaking about
accessibility and legal implications for Australian Developers at the
upcoming September WE04 conference.
:)
Russ
Have you forgotten Sydney Olympics web site, it was 4 years ago the Human
Rights Commission awarded
This is good info:
http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/standards/www_3/www_3.html
Also I spoke to someone from there and they said it had implications for any company
etc providing information or a service on a Internet or Intranet site (in Australia).
From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL
Unaccessible - NY Attorney General busts two big name sites
pedantry
Shouldn't that be inaccessible?
/pedantry
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards,
Hello fellow members of the Web Standards Group!
I'm trying to work out a centered layout with header, 2 columns and a
footer. The background picture is suppose 2 follow the content right down to
the footer, but appearently the float-property 'end' the
pagewidth-div(sidebredde) at the end of the
-Original Message-
From: Neerav
sites
The more salient question would be whether corporates can be forced to
do so in australia, as SOCOG was a government corporation. AFAIK whether
australian corporates can be forced to comply to W3C/accessibility
guidelines is untested in the
Title: Message
I heard about this on a radio campaign they're running ahead of
the new laws on accessibility and disabled rights in general in the
UK;
http://www.drc-gb.org
Jamie Mason: Design// Skysports.com, Central House,
Beckwith Knowle, Otley Road, Harrogate, HG3 1UF
T: (01423) 700849
Help wsg
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 16/08/2004
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud
Siteman DA - Bent Inge wrote:
Hello fellow members of the Web Standards Group!
I'm trying to work out a centered layout with header, 2 columns and a
footer. The background picture is suppose 2 follow the content right down to
the footer, but appearently the float-property 'end' the
for another point of view here's a link tothe Flash gurus at the
Flashnewbie list
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/
they're extremely knowledgeable when it comes to Flash
ByteDreams
- Original Message -
From: David McKinnon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17,
Thanks mugur!
That helped a lot :-) Now the page displays correct in all the mensioned
browsers.
http://www.siteman.no/prosjektweb/superoddsen/nettsted
Best regards,
Bent Inge
- Original Message -
From: mugur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 2:25
That's a nice site. I like the combination of bevels and drop shadows. They are
subtle enough to give dimension without being overwhelming. As a photographer, I tend
to notice and get bugged by sites that have multiple light sources, i.e. shadows
coming from top, left, right, ...
I noticed
Thank you, Ted :-)
If you're referring to the outline 'shadows' that is actually suppose to be
some kind of a beveleffect to give the impression of an elevated content
area. I might not have succeded ;-)
Thanks again, I wish U and all the members of the web standards group a
great weekend!
Bent
Hill, Tim wrote:
Wow, that's big, can't believe they had to pay $40,000 that's huge.
Relative to the size of the companies, it's not that big; however, it is
big enough not to ignore and for other companies to sit up and take notice.
The bottom line is that this could be very good for
Title: Nachricht
Hi
@llz,
Take a look at the
problem at www.albruco.com/erbguth.
The corresponding
stylesheet will be here www.albruco.com/erbguth/style.css.
You see, in IE the
horizontal 'box', which should be displayed as a line and it's height is defind
to 1px, appears terrible. This
Title: Nachricht
Sorry,
the link to the css should be: www.albruco.com/erbguth/css/main.css
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
I got an email from a friend at Intergraph Public Safety in Huntsville
AL (USA) who was looking for people with HTML, XML, CSS, and VBScript(!)
skills to work on getting their customers configured and teaching those
customers how to reconfigure their systems on a product which I surmise
from
You see, in IE the horizontal 'box', which should be displayed as a line and it's
height is defind to 1px, appears terrible. This problem ONLY exists in IE. Any ideas?
I can confirm it looks terrible in IE, though it appears almost as
ghastly in Firefox. Maybe it's the colour #f0 ?
22 matches
Mail list logo
