No you fool!
You messed it up...
It's a standard that only
members get :-)
Ben Hamilton wrote:
Richard Czeiger wrote:
no secret handshake?! I'm outta here!
;oP
Richard
It's a standard that only members get
:-)
Ben.
**
The discussion list
add a visibility:hidden and Im in.
Seriously though, this list is very high volume, but I vaguely recall
being warned of that when I signed up which is why I used a specific
account for it.
Good mail filtering solves any issues one may have with the volume.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:09:11 +1000, B
Richard Czeiger wrote:
no secret handshake?! I'm outta here!
;oP
Richard
It's a standard that only members get
:-)
Ben.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some h
no secret handshake?! I'm outta here!
;oP
Richard
- Original Message -
From:
Peter Firminger
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:36
PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] how so I stop all the
postings coming to my email box?
Hi Casey,
While an
Hi Casey,
While answering your question I am also answering some other
enquiries I have had recently so it's of interest to all (otherwise I'd answer
off list).
Joining WSG simply means joining the WSG mailing list.
That's all there is (well, you can also add resources to the website as a
Isabel Santos wrote:
It seams to me that the pda is trying to render the normal css
(principalquasar40.css) and not the pda's one - 01pda.css (where the
central column should occupy all the screen not showing any body
background and widths should be mutch smaller).
Unfortunately this is almost a
Hi Isabel,
I hope you read my previous mail. Here is the XHTML version of your
HTML document with just one error which of course can be rectified by
you. The file is sent in the form of an attachment. Let me know your
opinion as to how it works now.
Regards,
Dilip Samuel
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21
I'm struggling with something really basic - how to get tables within
a DIV to behave nicely in bother MSIE and everything else.
I have a CSS-based design. The important part is a wrapper DIV (#main)
that contains an absolutely positioned right-hand bar (#right) and the
content area (#content). #c
Hello Isabel Santos,
Please use or convert your HTML to XHTML. XHTML is universal in the
sense because small devices can easily read XHTML. This is so because
XHTML has properly nested tags.
Regards,
Dilip Samuel
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:45:34 +0100, Isabel Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
.shadowbox .content {
}
Should fix it. I didn't test it, so I could be wrong. But that's the
syntax from the original example.
Cheers.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:27:03 -0600, Richard Spence
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> I was just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on why the drop
That worked! Sweet!
My last problem seems also to be only in IE on the PC. Between the top
button that says "SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER" and the 12px tan border
of the header bar there is a green space where those 2 graphics aren't
lining up. Got any reason why this is a problem?
http://sonz
Chris Blown wrote:
Did I mention I hate analogies. ;)
as in your expansion of the analogy you're blaming *users* of IE, rather
than the developers that purely cater for IE and/or the programmers at
MS who made the leaky car, i'd say it's not too accurate anyway ;)
Patrick H. Lauke
_
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 22:14, Dean Jackson wrote:
> ..
> Would you intentionally build a car park that stopped Toyotas from
> entering?
>
If there was a lot of Toyotas parking in my building and being that they
all leaked oil in my car park and often their drivers scratched other
peoples cars beca
Hi Casey, welcome to the group.
I never tried the Digest Mode, but it sounds to me as if that might be doing
what you want. The way I personally set up my email account is to
automatically move all emails from this group into a dedicated folder, so
that they are seperate from all my other email. I
Hello All:
I was just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on why the drop shadows
on a new page that I am working on don't work.
http://www.runningman.ca/private/test/shadows.html
I got the original code from:
http://labs.silverorange.com/archives/2004/january/shadowboxing
The drop shadows work
Thanks to Russ for offering some serious criticism that I could use to
explore the weaknesses of this technique. I think I'll add a follow up
post about this one just because the original article only gave it as
a snippet and really didn't explain any advantages or shortcommings.
> So, apologies t
Is there any way to force word wrap, even on single words such as url’s
in a valid cross browser friendly way?
I think the short answer would be no. Depending on the exact need you
have, you could set a specific width and overflow:hidden to the block
containing the url, in which case they'll sim
Hi all,hope this isn't out of scope, both on
css-d and wsg:
On the template I'm working on, I decided it would
be cool to give it a pda friendly version, for the target public would be kind
of eager for new technologies.Following the ALA article on taking your site
into the smaller screen,
Ups.. Guess I forgot to
press ctrl-v:
white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-3 */ white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; /* Mozilla, since 1999 */ white-space: -pre-wrap; /* Opera 4-6 */ white-space: -o-pre-wrap; /* Opera 7 */ word-wrap: break-word; /* Internet Explorer 5.5+ */
Hi all
I’m having a bit of a problem with long urls in
a 3 column web layout. I want the urls to be in my right column, but they are
to long and wont wrap properly because they are a single word.
I have found the following css rules, but the ie tag
doesn’t validate.
Is there any way
Hi,
just do this. Send an email from your subscribed account to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "set mode digest wsg" (no quotes) as
the BODY (not subject) and it will be so. And you will just receive one
email every few days or so containing every mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still keep getting th
russ - maxdesign wrote:
You may have been thinking about CSS-Discuss where it came up recently:
And Webmasterworld:
Thanks Russ. It must have been the css-d thread since looking back I see
that I read it and since the Webmasterworld reference was my postI
guess I got the line height addition
Will do Mike. Thanks for the constructive criticism. I'll delete the
full screen.
Good suggestion.
Shane Helm
On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:43 PM, Michael Allan wrote:
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, at 03:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
If others have solved your
Hi, I just JOINED your group last night
and now find my email box bomb-barred with to
many messages / how do I stop them and still remain a member of your group. I simple want to
read the messages from your boards. Is that what the Digest Mode does, because
that is not clearly indicate
I still keep getting these digest emails even though I unsubscribed. Please
take me off your list. Thank you.
Jim Trick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14, October, 2004 13:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: digest for [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:35 , Christie Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>"Why is this site best viewed with FireFox? Try it and experience the
>difference."
I do like this approach, and even tho i do link to Browserhappy.com and
spreadfirefox i
think the NON-IE bit should be reworked to promote th
Instead of going negative, how about going positive? Most people don't know
that they have a choice of browsers and they're scared that if they install
a different one, that the computer will "break".
To "help" people understand that the browser world is wider than IE, I put
this linked notice on
Mark
There are quite a few articles now in the mainstream media that expose
the Skoda like qualities of IE, maybe you should link to these? Sydney
Morning Herald ICON section quite regularly rates Opera and Moz as the
best available. PC User Australia had a big article "Why you shouldn't
use IE
Mordechai Peller wrote:
what I would like to know is "Why?"
ok, but the "What" wasn't quite clear, hence my question.
Try:
—Test
Ok, see what you mean now. Well, for the "Why" I think the only
explanation that I can think of is "you may be experiencing a cascade
failure — one error that gets T
> I remember reading a similar suggestion a while back (I don't remember
> where) which included {border : 0; font-site 100.1%; line-height : 1.6;}
> (actually, other than being there, I don't remember what the line height
> was, but I suppose it doesn't matter for this thread).
You may have been
I've been thinking on and off all day and I'd like to do an ignominious
about-face on the zeroing margin and padding technique.
My initial concerns were that:
1. could be more verbose
2. could confuse less-savy future developers.
The verbose issue is easy to overcome. You can zero margins and pad
Make sure to grab my "served as 'application/xhtml+xml' where available"
badge ;)
http://www.splintered.co.uk/about/
Patrick
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.
One of the pillars of Web Standards is that "content" should be "Best Viewed With Any
Browser". This principle is fundamental to Web Standards.
We actually adhere to this principle when we use the CSS "import" directive to hide
CSS from Netscape 4 so that it's poor support for CSS is not going t
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:58 , john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>Doesn't ditching IE run contrary to the whole idea of accessibility and
>using Web standards?
It does, but im not really ditching IE im more just refusing to add the fix's for
th PNG-LOGO
and sorting the margin/padding issuse with the
On 18 Oct 2004, at 21:10, Mark Harwood wrote:
Not commercialy, but personaly on your own blog sites are other little
community
sites?
I've just redesigned my blog (www.phunky.co.uk) and in doing so i
decided i was
not going
to touch some of the minor issuse that IE has with my site, although
it
well, IE is the bane of my life, and i wish everybody would just see
the light and switch to Firefox :)
but, when it comes down to it, the Web is about communication.
commercial or personal, if your site falls apart for of your audience, you're not communicating very well.
and the ability to cr
On 18 Oct 2004, at 13:37, Ryan Christie wrote:
You're free to make your own W3C badges to place on your site. Most
people I see, incl. myself, just use text links in the footer. W3C
won't hunt you down for infringement or anything.
There are definitely some copyright issues in using the logo with
On 18 Oct 2004, at 12:50, Rick Faaberg wrote:
Hi all,
Who can I send a suggestion to at W3C that they make their web badges
a lot
more subtle (and smaller) so that I would actually use them on my
sites?
I work for the W3C and I've heard your suggestion.
While I'm not the badges guy, I know they h
Doesn't ditching IE run contrary to the whole idea of accessibility and
using Web standards? The point isn't to get people to switch from IE,
but rather, to design in a way that will reach the broadest audience for
years to come.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://
I did say not commercialy, but on my personal site...
Altho my worries is that it could effect my commercial work :S
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:29 , Mike Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>>I just wanna know your view on ditching IE on purpose?
>
>Commercial suicide :o)
>
>Mike Pepper
>Accessible Web
Nah, they're different :o) Not as good ;o)
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer ()
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
GAWDS Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Michael Dale
Sent: 18 October 2004 12:28
To: [EMAIL PR
I think it is a very dangerous decision to make! IE is still by far the most
common browser and you might be right that clients could get a bit nervous
when they see you are anti-IE. It took me such a long time to ditch NN 4,
but now that I have done it it just feels great! Dropping IE will take a
>I just wanna know your view on ditching IE on purpose?
Commercial suicide :o)
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer ()
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
GAWDS Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mark Harwood
Sent
Thank google ;)
http://images.google.com.au/images?q=validate+w3c&hl=en&lr=&start=20&sa=N
Michael Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Mike Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:04:11 +1000
Subject: RE: [WSG] w3c badges
> Pleased you lik
Not commercialy, but personaly on your own blog sites are other little community
sites?
I've just redesigned my blog (www.phunky.co.uk) and in doing so i decided i was
not going
to touch some of the minor issuse that IE has with my site, although it would
only take
me a little bit of time to get
Nick Lo wrote:
I was just reading the article excerpted below and was curious as to
how many on the list have used this technique of initially setting all
padding and margins to 0 and if so how successful was it?
I remember reading a similar suggestion a while back (I don't remember
where) whic
Pleased you like them, Michael ;o)
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer ()
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
GAWDS Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Michael Dale
Sent: 18 October 2004 04:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for posting the article in the first place, I should've known
the writer would've been on this list!
Anyway, I like the idea and I have a suspicion it'll work pretty well
for my needs. I just tried it in a site I'm working on and it actually
didn't break much and in fact I can
The following Web Standards Articles are written by some of the best
designers/coders in the business and are sure to help all web designers
whether new to CSS/XHTML or quite experienced with problems commonly
faced when using CSS:
(Links are at
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/2004/10/18/solving-c
I think this is a strong argument for introducing this
technique to others. The most oft-cited reason for not
using semantic HTML is the perceived control that can
be achieved by using tables/a lot of divs.
By removing this "mystery" dimension from the size of
elements, it could help people to bec
50 matches
Mail list logo
