John S. Britsios wrote:
Hi Richard,
Very good work! Very nice web site!
My suggestions:
1. The XHTML 1.0 recommendation states that both "lang" and "xml:lang"
attributes should be used when specifying the language of an element.
The value of the "xml:lang" attribute takes precedence.
ass
Hi Richard,
Very good work! Very nice web site!
My suggestions:
1. The XHTML 1.0 recommendation states that both "lang" and "xml:lang"
attributes should be used when specifying the language of an element.
The value of the "xml:lang" attribute takes precedence.
2. The "style" attribute has b
You must Focas. Sorry, couldn't resist.
:P
Thanks for the heads-up.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Focas,
GrantSent: Monday, 7 November 2005 12:12 PMTo:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: [WSG] Firefox onblur and onfocus
event bubbling bug
Hi
standardis
Focas, Grant wrote:
Anyone with Firefox 1.5 beta know if this issue is
fixed in that version?
Firefox 1.5rc1 still has the same faulty behaviour...how weird.
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositive
Hi standardistas,
I’ve had a problem with onfocus and onblur where
Firefox is calling onblur before onfocus when clicking on an input element.
This is a bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53118
) because it goes against the DOM2 Event handling spec.
The only way around
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
document
:
Hi,
I suppose Chris referred to the machine readable code - In this case
I'd use your
= div
- header
* list
etc.
solution.
Cheers,
Janos
2005/11/6, Terrence Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Patrick H. Lauke said:
> > Janos Hardi wrote:
> >> ...a Hx element semantically connected with a list
> >
>
Assuming Terrence meant to send the message below to the list, and not
just me. And in response: yes, I've heard something along those lines as
well (JAWS recognising changes to DOM initiated by user interaction).
Damn, I need to get myself another copy of JAWS (used to have 4.01 at
work many m
Patrick H. Lauke said:
> Janos Hardi wrote:
>> ...a Hx element semantically connected with a list
>
> LABEL is expected to point to a form control, not a list. It may
> validate in terms of syntax, but in terms of logic it doesn't make
> sense...
Unfortunately HTML validators do contain errors. Al
Okay I retreat :)
Perhaps we can use one of the followings:
Heading for stuff list
stuff No.1
..
or:
Stuff category/term
Stuff No.1
I think now the closest solution is using the DL list. Thx for the info Patrick.
Janos
**
The discussion
Return Receipt
Your document: RE: [WSG] Page Check:
www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
Janos Hardi wrote:
but the starting point was that Chris
wanted a Hx element semantically connected with a list (with valid
xhtml code).
I understand, but I'd argue that your solution with LABEL is no more
semantically connected than the original one without, as LABEL is
expected to point to
> Yes it seems but:
>
> "Navigation lists are intended to be used to define collections of
> selectable items for presentation in a "navigation" menu. Note that a
> navigation list always starts with a label element that defines the
> label for the list."
>
> The spec tells us that this list is (on
Yes it seems but:
"Navigation lists are intended to be used to define collections of
selectable items for presentation in a "navigation" menu. Note that a
navigation list always starts with a label element that defines the
label for the list."
The spec tells us that this list is (only?) for navig
> Hey Patrick,
>
> Yes I understand your doubts but the starting point was that Chris
> wanted a Hx element semantically connected with a list (with valid
> xhtml code).
> I think my solution is okay but I'd never use it ;)
> I use the plain DL that has DT elements useable for "pseudo-headings".
>
Hey Patrick,
Yes I understand your doubts but the starting point was that Chris
wanted a Hx element semantically connected with a list (with valid
xhtml code).
I think my solution is okay but I'd never use it ;)
I use the plain DL that has DT elements useable for "pseudo-headings".
Janos
2005/1
> I do not know is this a solution for our problem but it seems it does
> the semantic and valid job - i made it a bit complex but its now a
> closely real-world example :)
>
> This is a Header
> for my stuff list
>
> my stuff No.1
> my stuff No.2
>
>
> Regards,
> Janos
Wait, is this valid? I th
Janos Hardi wrote:
I do not know is this a solution for our problem but it seems it does
the semantic and valid job - i made it a bit complex but its now a
closely real-world example :)
This is a Header
for my stuff list
my stuff No.1
my stuff No.2
Hmmm...the spec for label only mentions as
Hi,
I do not know is this a solution for our problem but it seems it does
the semantic and valid job - i made it a bit complex but its now a
closely real-world example :)
This is a Header
for my stuff list
my stuff No.1
my stuff No.2
Regards,
Janos
2005/11/6, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECT
> I understand your desire to be completely explicit in terms of assigning
> a header to a list, I'd say that (X)HTML is just not that explicit a
> language in that respect, and that *source order* is used to infer a lot
> of this type of assignment. Think, for instance, about a normal page
> struc
Christian Montoya wrote:
I think those both do not solve the problem. How do I give a
definition list a header?
I understand your desire to be completely explicit in terms of assigning
a header to a list, I'd say that (X)HTML is just not that explicit a
language in that respect, and that *sou
I think those both do not solve the problem. How do I give a
definition list a header?
Dictionary
word
def
word
def
I would like to do:
Dictionary
...
...
Any solution that involves nested lists is really bad IMO. That makes
things too complex.
--
--
C Montoya
rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpd
Or you could nest it, even, if that's valid. Sounds awful complex though...
header
Though I remain uncertain as to the semantic value of that, even if it is valid.
Josh
On 11/6/05, Janos Hardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And what about the definition list? It seems to me t
Hi,
And what about the definition list? It seems to me that is a plain way
to do that job m8.
header
item1
...
dl is handy because you can use more "headers" (dt tags) in the same list etc.
Regards,
Janos
2005/11/6, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Great idea, Christian, but you'v
> Great idea, Christian, but you've been scooped: LH was part of the
> 1993 HTML3 specification in the UL, OL, and DL definitions, such as:
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/deflists.html
>
> LH appears to have disappeared from the specs between HTML 3.0 and
> 3.2, but I wasn't able to discover whe
At 11:15 PM 11/5/2005, Christian Montoya wrote:
What I would like to do is have a list header, much like tables have
table headers.
I wrote more about this here:
http://montoya.rdpdesign.com/2005/11/06/list-headers-an-idea/
But what it basically boils down to is having a tag I call "list
header
26 matches
Mail list logo