Re: [WSG] Quick Site Check Please

2006-03-01 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Thank you everyone for your input, its been very helpful! Joseph R. B. Taylor Sites by Joe, LLC http://sitesbyjoe.com (609)335-3076 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ulrich Maasmeier wrote: Hi! I´m just surfing a biz around, and it looks fine o me on Mac OSX 10.4 w Opera 8.52 There can´t be any Sizing probl

Re: [WSG] Quick Site Check Please

2006-03-01 Thread Ulrich Maasmeier
Hi! I´m just surfing a biz around, and it looks fine o me on Mac OSX 10.4 w Opera 8.52 There can´t be any Sizing problems to me, because Opera sizes the WHOLE PAGE, not just Text. All is working fine, and the hovering effects are nice and useful. Good Luck! Limasign On 2/28/06, Joseph R. B.

Re: [WSG] Quick Site Check Please

2006-03-01 Thread Felix Miata
On 06/02/28 19:59 Joseph R. B. Taylor apparently typed: I have my nav text set to 1.0em. I have the height of each li set to 1.75em. I wrongly assumed that the li would expand along with the text since they both used ems for sizing... If you do much font sizing and element nesting you're liab

Re: [WSG] HELP

2006-03-01 Thread Lloyd
www.udm4.com Takes an accessible list and turns it into a menu - can easily be incorporated into PHP. I use it successfully at: http://guild.murdoch.edu.au/ Lloyd On 3/1/06, Al Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone point me in the right direction < not out the door please :) > to > fin

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Jon Gunderson
The Mozilla/Firefox accessibility extension provides a means to view labels or lack of labels from with Mozilla or Firefox. http://cita.rehab.uiuc.edu/software/mozilla/ Jon Original message >Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:58:12 +0100 >From: Kim Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [W

Re: [WSG] Quick Site Check Please

2006-03-01 Thread James Ellis
Looks fine to me on: * Konquerer 3.5.1 * FF 1.5 * Opera 8.5 on Fedora If you want to run Linux but don't want to install it have a look at running a VMware virtual appliance via vmplayer -> http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/ or just download a linux distro on a live cd like kubuntu -> http:/

Re: [WSG] HELP

2006-03-01 Thread Ray Cauchi
http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_TreeMenu At 07:17 PM 1/03/2006, Al Kendall wrote: Can anyone point me in the right direction < not out the door please :) > to finding a good PHP Menu / Navigation script? -- Thanks! Al Kendall Best Regards Ray Cauchi Manager/Lead Developer ( T W E E K ! )

Re: [WSG] HELP

2006-03-01 Thread Ray Cauchi
http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_TreeMenu At 07:17 PM 1/03/2006, Al Kendall wrote: Can anyone point me in the right direction < not out the door please :) > to finding a good PHP Menu / Navigation script? -- Thanks! Al Kendall Best Regards Ray Cauchi Manager/Lead Developer ( T W E E K ! )

RE: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Patrick Lauke
> McIvor Lee > The phrasing of the Cynthia results page suggests that there > are alternative > methods to pass this particular checkpoint without using a > label, but I don't > know of one. Adding a title attribute to the form element (in this case, the SELECT) is one of these alternatives. P

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Kim Kruse
Excellent. Thanks everyone... and why didn't I ask before! Kim Kruse wrote: When I run this site http://mouseriders.dk/index.php through Cynthia validator (level 1,2,3) it fails Priority 2 - forms 12.4.3 and I just can't figure out why. Could someone please explain it to me? Thanks a lot

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Darren West
Opps, and associated the label with and id. For instance: Please choose Daz On 01/03/06, Darren West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kim, > > You need to associate a label * with your select element. For instance: > > > > > * Please choose > > > Vælg her > > Sort/Grøn >

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Johannes Reiss
When I run this site http://mouseriders.dk/index.php through Cynthia validator (level 1,2,3) it fails Priority 2 - forms 12.4.3 and I just can't figure out why. Could someone please explain it to me? Thanks a lot sorry for my last Mail: must be something like: NN: http://webstandardsgrou

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Johannes Reiss
Hi, When I run this site http://mouseriders.dk/index.php through Cynthia validator (level 1,2,3) it fails Priority 2 - forms 12.4.3 and I just can't figure out why. Could someone please explain it to me? Thanks a lot Vælg her...=> must be something like:for="xy">

Re:[WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread McIvor Lee
Hi Kim, If you use a label element with that particular SELECT field (the one named "select"), then that should solve it. The phrasing of the Cynthia results page suggests that there are alternative methods to pass this particular checkpoint without using a label, but I don't know of one. Hope t

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Darren West
Hi Kim, You need to associate a label * with your select element. For instance: * Please choose Vælg her Sort/Grøn Hvid/Blå Sæt accesskeys Substituting 'Please choose' with something indicative of the select elements choices. Daz On

Re: [WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Ian Anderson
Kim Kruse wrote: When I run this site http://mouseriders.dk/index.php through Cynthia validator (level 1,2,3) it fails Priority 2 - forms 12.4.3 and I just can't figure out why. Could someone please explain it to me? Thanks a lot You don't have a label for the select menu on the left hand sid

[WSG] Validation problem

2006-03-01 Thread Kim Kruse
When I run this site http://mouseriders.dk/index.php through Cynthia validator (level 1,2,3) it fails Priority 2 - forms 12.4.3 and I just can't figure out why. Could someone please explain it to me? Thanks a lot -- Med venlig hilsen/Best regards Kim Kruse - http://w

[WSG] HELP

2006-03-01 Thread Al Kendall
Can anyone point me in the right direction < not out the door please :) > to finding a good PHP Menu / Navigation script?-- Thanks!Al Kendall

Re: [WSG] IE Patent stupidity meets... us.

2006-03-01 Thread Justin Carter
On 3/1/06, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Slightly peeved that Microsoft's patent violation ages ago means that > we [may] now have to make changes en-mass to keep websites > functioning, and extend browser discrepancies in implementations of > certain features even further than at pres