Daniel,
The problem with this approach would be that you'd be over-riding the natural
behaviour of the label, which would be to ease focussing on the associated
field.
Lee
Daniel Nitsche (14/03/2006 03:31):
>As an idea, why not make the label for each field a link, which will provide
>conte
This message has been returned to you because I will be on leave from Wed
15/3/2006 to Friday 17/3/2006. During my absence, please contact Judy Hageman
on 72224
([EMAIL PROTECTED])."
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Felix Miata wrote:
The author here is the lead layout developer in the Mozilla project:
http://dbaron.org/log/2005-12#e20051228a
Well, I don't read anything in the author's cited reference for CSS floats -
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#floats - to imply that floats
were intended sol
<...>
> I don't think the Baron reference is sufficient evidence for the
> assertion that using floats for layout is an abuse of them. On the
> contrary, I have seen several references in the last few years that
> stated floats *were* the preferred layout method by the W3C CSS working
> group.
<...
Paula Petrik wrote:
The reason I pose these questions is that I am testing a WYSIWYG
program whose goal is to accommodate the rank beginner and the
advanced user. I think that the engineers have hit on the idea of
using absolute positioning to prevent beginners from making float
errors--an
I've often wondered why these so-called tag clouds don't use and
tags (maybe they do ?)
normal
slightly important
quite important
lesser stuff
least important
extremely important
they are inline tags. they convey meaning : 2 bigs is more important
than 1 big etc.
ideas?
Cheers
James
On 3
On 3/14/06, James Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've often wondered why these so-called tag clouds don't use and
> tags (maybe they do ?)
>
> they are inline tags. they convey meaning : 2 bigs is more important
> than 1 big etc.
>
The problem there is that and tags _don't_ mean
anything. T
As always, there is no write or wrong, just opinion. To me, a tag cloud is
simply a list of links.
Key issues are:
- Some degree of meaningful link text for screen reader users
- Colour (as mentioned in an earlier post) not used to convey critical info
- Some degree of semantic meaning of gradient
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
Keryx webb writes:
According to my tests Firefox *will* use the charset specified in the
http-header over the one in the XML-prologue if a page is sent as
application/xhtml+xml. (Or more exactly, regardless whether the page
is sent as text/html or application/xhtml+x
If you took the Help images out of a link tag and then used JS to
create the popup behaviour, then the help image would not be included
in the tab-order.
I.e.
...
var x=document.getElementById("helpimg_4001");
x.onclick=popupfunction;...
Stephen
On 13 Mar 2006, at 19:31, <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hej!
Keryx webb skrev:
That's what we were discussing. If a page is sent as XHTML, one could
argue that it's supposed to be self-documenting, and that it might
mean that the xml-prologue should be more important than the
http-header. As my page proves, in FFox, MSIE and Opera (the three
I've
Tag clouds are, almost always, a list of links ordered alphabetically, in which the more "whatever", the bigger in font size. So it seems logical to use a simple UL with As in every LI.You are right about semantic meaning on presentation, but you could add the frequency to the tag {Japan (14798) Ky
A friend wants to design a site to look something like
http://home.alltel.net/omen/JGM-home-idea.gif
Whats the best approach for this? dividing the image up?
How would I over lay the header,content,footer?
Any ideas or links would be very helpful.
Thanks!
Background Image...
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Any ideas or links would be very helpful.
Thanks!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/gu
Of the body or a container div?.. and have a div with padding to set
it in the middle?
Is this the best practice for a site of this idea?
Thanks!
On 3/14/06, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Background Image...
>
>
>
> Tom Livingston
> Senior Multimedia Artist
> Media Logic
> www
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Morphis
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 3:27 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] ideas for this site
Of the body or a container div?.. and have a div with padding to set it
in the middle?
That makes sense. I'm going to give it a whirl and see what I can mock
up for him.
Thanks again!
On 3/14/06, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Morphis
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 3:
Thanks for the heads-up and pointing me in the right direction Terrence.
PaulH
This information is intended for the addressee only. The use, copying or
distribution of this message or any information it contains, by anyone other
than the addressee is prohibited by the sender.
Any views expres
Hi All
I love using sprites, but I've never seen this happen before.
I've got a sprite that looks like this
+
+
Only imagine the top plus is a different shade so that when you hover, it
shifts and changes color. Simple enough.
Only, in IE6, it looks like this in the link
_ _
|_ _|
Man, sprites, I haven't heard that since I used to program for the
Commodore 65.
Have you got any sort of image resizing going on in the HTML? The image
is getting slightly distorted correct?
Samuel
Ted Drake wrote:
Hi All
I love using sprites, but I've never seen this happen before.
I'v
Keryx webb writes:
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
Keryx webb writes:
That's what we were discussing. If a page is sent as XHTML, one could
argue that it's supposed to be self-documenting, and that it might mean
that the xml-prologue should be more important than the http-header. As my
page pro
Ted Drake wrote:
I love using sprites, but I've never seen this happen before.
I've got a sprite that looks like this
[snip - useless ASCII art diagrams]
I think you'll find someone may actually be able to help you if you
provide a link to a sample document (preferably a minimal test case)
d
I know this is an extremely subjective question to ask... However...
Does anyone have an opinion (ha!) regarding who they believe to be the most
creative/impressive standards-based Web interface designer/s in Australia
(preferably, but not necessarily, Sydney) at this particular point in
history?
Ted Drake wrote:
Has anyone seen this before? I don't know why it is showing such odd
behavior with the background image. There's another link in the list with a
similarly broken arrow and another with a perfectly fine printer sprite.
Any code we can look at? Even just on a temporary page or
Hi All
I've been struggling with a conflict between an absolutely positioned drop
down list with z-index and the objects that follow it in the page.
After doing a lot of testing and searching for information, I've been able
to solve some of the issues. I've got a couple blog posts on
www.last-chi
Hi Patrick, Lachlan
Unfortunately the project is still behind a firewall, that's why I'm being
so vague. Lachlan's advice did get me to look at the links on other pages
and it is indeed a very localized issue. So, I can look at conflicts in that
area. I think I have more problems with this set
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
I was wondering if you should have another test in there: XHTML document
with no encoding declared in the http header or in a meta tag, and no
xml declaration. Sent as html/text.
That's text/html and an XHTML document served as text/html is HTML,
regardless of any lie
Lachlan Hunt writes:
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
I was wondering if you should have another test in there: XHTML document
with no encoding declared in the http header or in a meta tag, and no xml
declaration. Sent as html/text.
That's text/html and an XHTML document served as text/html is HTML,
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
Lachlan Hunt writes:
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
In theory the docuemnt should only be in one of the unicode
encodings, so without a BOM, the browser should try to render it as
UTF-8.
No, because when it's served as text/html, HTML rules apply, not XML
rules. So witho
29 matches
Mail list logo
