Thanks very much for all the replies here. I'll get back to the others
who have commented. In the meantime, its fair to say that we're very
aware of the issues around wcag2, mainly those concerning usability. I
think the W3C themselves are open that using it requires quite a bit of
dev knowledge.
> I am always curious why so rarely people in this list ever mention
> Dean Edwards' IE7.
Maybe it is because it's a JavaScript solution. If you have JavaScript
disabled, you are back to where you started. Of course, this may be a better
solution than not trying to support IE6 at all which I rea
Directed to standards aware developers in the SF Bay Area:
http://jobs.stanford.edu Job ID# 32035
...back to your regularly scheduled list-serve, already in progress.
Cheers!
JF
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.o
What you mean?
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome
de Juarez Filho
Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2008 12:25
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Assunto: Re: [WSG] Incorporating Terms and Cons in signup page
I think the better approach is p
I think the better approach is put a link to users see the Terms &
Conditions, because you probably will need to show this again in
another section of the site. For JS capabilities browsers you can use
the power of JS and Ajax to do a great interface. =D
--
Regards,
Juarez P. A. Filho
http://jua
What I see a lot of times that seems to be a decent idea is in the form
have a check box with the label "I have read and agree to the Terms &
Conditions". Then, have "Terms & Conditions" actually be a link to a
separate document (preferably a web page) which actually has the terms
and condition
I would recommend a div element with a fixed height and overflow:auto.
Use of a textarea would not be semantically correct because it is not user
input. The only reason that leads to its use is that is gives you a scroll
bar for free, however this can be achieved with relative ease as mentioned
be
Well we've been working on a global sign in and registration system for some
time now and the conclusion we've come to with the T's & C's is to not
include it in the page by default - have a link to it and hope that when the
user clicks back their user agent will repopulate the fields (as most seem
On Sep 30, 2008, at 9:15 AM, John Unsworth wrote:
Hi WSG,
I'm wondering about the best method to incorporate in a signup form a
Terms and Conditions agreement, which being so long will be bought to
the page externally. Or if it's thought best, maybe not!
On a previous occasion I went forward us
Hi WSG,
I'm wondering about the best method to incorporate in a signup form a
Terms and Conditions agreement, which being so long will be bought to
the page externally. Or if it's thought best, maybe not!
On a previous occasion I went forward using the tag. The
advantage to my mind is that, my doc
David Fuller :: magickweb wrote:
> Just a silly idea, but what about using a background image, with a
> transparent gif over it, the gif is the return to top link... Being part of
> the background it wont print, you can make it PART of the background without
> it looking like a special link etc..
>
Hey every1...
Just a silly idea, but what about using a background image, with a
transparent gif over it, the gif is the return to top link... Being part of
the background it wont print, you can make it PART of the background without
it looking like a special link etc..
Just a random thought that
Hi Joe,
"Therefore, the use of 'Return to top' link will be required unless I can prove
to my client that users don't click them via studies, research or user
feedback, not just only from my personal experience."
I think you answered your own question there... Can you do some studies or
resear
> Does anyone think that WCAG 2.0 will improve the user experience?
> Or do you take my view that it only benefits developers,
> and that the user experience will be worse in future?
_Personally_ I think that it is basically a retrograde step. Version
one was too complex for most people to ful
Steve Green wrote:
Does anyone think that WCAG 2.0 will improve the user experience? Or do you
take my view that it only benefits developers, and that the user experience
will be worse in future?
This is my view as well.
Mark Harris
***
Joe Chiang wrote:
Perhaps, implement something like 'sticky sidebar' or 'position
fixed' to present the 'Return to top' link rather than adding it
after each section is another option I look favourably at. Obviously,
I need to work out on IE6 for this.
http://www.derekallard.com/blog/post/con
Robin Shi wrote:
> In my experience, "position: fixed" seems not work with IE.
>
It is supported by IE7.
As a concept, however, it is pretty much incompatible with horizontal
navigation bars plus links with fragment identifiers.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
**
On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:18 AM, Joe Chiang wrote:
Perhaps, implement something like 'sticky sidebar' or 'position fixed'
to present the 'Return to top' link rather than adding it after each
section is another option I look favourably at. Obviously, I need to
work out on IE6 for this.
http://www.d
Thank you everyone for sharing your thoughts and commenting.
After reading through the responses to my original post, I'm trying to
frame a conclusion here.
But first, a little website background:
- target audience don't have much computer background
- majority of target audience use IE 6/7
- sin
19 matches
Mail list logo
