Re: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Indeed, nor if you supply an alternative source of information. Sent from my iPhone On 24/02/2010, at 4:28 PM, "Webb, KerryA" wrote: Jason wrote: Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be h

RE: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Jason wrote: > Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be held responsible and found negligent and be required to pay compensation as directed by a court of law. Ref case : Maguire vs. SOCOG http://ww

Re: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be held responsible and found negligent and be required to pay compensation as directed by a court of law. Ref case : Maguire vs. SOCOG http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disa

Re: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

That's exactly what it means ;) Sad but true. Resources ... blah blah ... deadlines ... blah blah ... too much work .. blah blah ... I suspect it's a familiar story to many. L. On 24 February 2010 14:59, sans principles wrote: > Does this mean the moral obligation alone is not compelling eno

Re: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Does this mean the moral obligation alone is not compelling enough for your organisation to be convinced to follow the requirement, and they will only do so if there is a danger of legal issues? sp. (<<< in a similar situation). . Lucien wrote: I work for a

Re: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Thanks for that Kerry. On 24 February 2010 14:17, Webb, KerryA wrote: > Nedlud wrote: > > > Hi people, > > > > I see that the Australian government has required all government > > agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015. > > > > http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility > > > >

RE: [WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Nedlud wrote: > Hi people, > > I see that the Australian government has required all government > agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015. > > http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility > > I work for a non profit organisation that receives government funding, but > > I am unawar

[WSG] NPO web standards guidelines in Australia?

Hi people, I see that the Australian government has required all government agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015. http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility I work for a non profit organisation that receives government funding, but I am unaware of our legal obligation to acces

Re: [WSG] @media

> Does this help? > Russ Very much. That's great! THanks a lot!! -- Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup

Re: [WSG] @media

Hi Tom, Sorry, I should have provided examples in my last email. 1. Below is a normal CSS rule (like the first rule in the 456bereastreet article) - which does not need a media type to be defined: body { background: #fff; } 2. Below is an @media rule, which DOES need a media defined (note

Re: [WSG] @media

Thanks for the comprehensive reply! Marvellous! Bob - Original Message - From: "Russ Weakley" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] @media 1. Is there a list showing browser support for @media? Try the ever-helpful Site Point. The chart shows genera

Re: [WSG] @media

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Russ Weakley wrote: >> 1. Is there a list showing browser support for @media? > > Try the ever-helpful Site Point. The chart shows generally good support > (with some caveats): > > > The chart mentions IE and Firefox ar

Re: [WSG] @media

1. Is there a list showing browser support for @media? Try the ever-helpful Site Point. The chart shows generally good support (with some caveats): The chart mentions IE and Firefox are buggy - but be aware that they are buggy in the opposite w

Re: [WSG] @media

Try searching for "css at'media" - google'll ask if you meant "css @media" and voila! Regards, Jon Warner Tel: 07890 299 836 http://thepixelforge.net/ 57 Arnold Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5AR England On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, designer wrote: > Hi all, > > I have Googled @media but

[WSG] @media

Hi all, I have Googled @media but it is hard to get to what I want because Google doesn't seem to recognise the '@'. So, please stick with me whilst I ask some daft questions: 1. Is there a list showing browser support for @media? 2. I want to combine my ordinary CSS with my print style s