RE: [WSG] Interesting reading

2004-06-14 Thread Chris Keane
Has anyone else seen any changes in larger organisations? Yep, we do work for some medium-to-large companies and nonprofits in the US (Clairol, Marriott, Disney), and while individual client interest in standards varies (usually dependent on clients' general technical awareness, IMO), we do get

RE: [WSG] strange white flash on mouseover

2004-06-01 Thread Chris Keane
while scrolling up/down with your mouse wheel. That really set off the flicker on my browser. HTH, Chris Keane * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints

RE: [WSG] css and accessibility question

2004-05-12 Thread Chris Keane
In the (odd) case i'm right, is there some spec that states that an image always needs a description? The http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd requires an alt attribute for images, and the HTML DTD shows a similar requirement: !ELEMENT img EMPTY !ATTLIST img %attrs; src

RE: [WSG] EMBED tag

2004-05-11 Thread Chris Keane
If it is the only thing causing a site not to validate, what harm is it really? Won't it push IE into quirks mode because it's not validating? * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

RE: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Chris Keane
You should make up a test that starts with typical graphical elements that your company uses and perhaps a hand drawn mock up of a page. Have them design first in fireworks or whatever your graphic design tool of choice is the layout and then ask them to create a rough HTML of it. Then you can

RE: [WSG] What tha!?

2004-03-29 Thread Chris Keane
I just checked my site www.cinema4duser.com in Mozilla and it wasn't applying CSS. have you validated your CSS? http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ I find that if part of the CSS is invalid, Mozilla ignores the wholething. Sometimes even a single line will crash it. Try commenting out