Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2008-12-22 Thread Geoff Pack
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009. If it's urgent, you can contact me on: m. 0429 348 132 e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or

Re: [WSG] Decorative bolding

2008-02-14 Thread Geoff Pack
C. b class=logo On 12/2/08 9:55 AM, Rachel May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I have a client who requires part of their name to be bolded within the body text for brand reasons. This I see as decorative, therefore it would not be correct to strong it... Do I: a. Use the b

Re: [WSG] Float-less layouts

2008-01-07 Thread Geoff Pack
Thierry wrote (in the linked article, not his post): DIVs are meaningless and cannot represent the structure of a document Really? According to the HTML 3.2 spec, where they first appear: DIV elements can be used to structure HTML documents as a hierarchy of divisions.

Re: [WSG] Float-less layouts

2008-01-07 Thread Geoff Pack
Al Sparber wrote: The problem is with the standard. If one gets too hung up on semantic markup then there is the risk of bending the logical or implied semantics of an element to suit ones project. I submit that in the absence of a perfectly specific semantically correct element for a given

RE: [WSG] Appropriate use of the ABBR tag and Roman Numerals

2007-11-29 Thread Geoff Pack
Since they're Roman numerals, shouldn't there be a lang=la in there somewhere? Geoff. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help:

[WSG] Opera for Nintendo Wii and CSS

2007-10-24 Thread Geoff Pack
I've been looking around the Opera site, but can't find answers to the following: Does Opera on the Wii support handlheld and/or projection stylesheets? SVG? Also, is SVG supported on the Nintendo DS browser? Thanks, Geoff.

RE: [WSG] Cost of Accessibility

2007-10-07 Thread Geoff Pack
McLaughlin, Gail G wrote: We always ask the client if they require that the site comply with accessibility. The response ranges from What is accessibility? to we'll worry about that later to No! Why bother asking? You don't need you clients' permission to build a site properly. Geoff.

RE: [WSG] Cost of Accessibility

2007-10-05 Thread Geoff Pack
Tony Crockford wrote: we don't have finders-keepers and it's mine, I saw it first or give it to me or I'll pull your hair as social rules outside the playground (and I suspect our educators are doing their best to change those rules too...) Well, actually we do. What do you think

RE: [WSG] ABC News Online have a new website

2007-06-28 Thread Geoff Pack
AFAIK, the ABC News developers aren't subcribed to this list, but I've forwarded the feedback here to them. Cheers, Geoff Pack _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Pollard Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2007 19:12 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re

[WSG] Safari now on Windows

2007-06-11 Thread Geoff Pack
This will be interesting... Safari 3 Public Beta: http://www.apple.com/safari/ == The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or copyright

[WSG] Divs and Sections (was: What does Semantic mean?)

2007-06-06 Thread Geoff Pack
Lucien Stals wrote: A DIV (and a SPAN for that matter) are purely structural, not semantic. The only difference between a div and a span is that one is a block level element, and the other is an inline element. Apart from that, they have the same semantic meaning, which is none at all. And

RE: [WSG] Map of Australia Image Map

2007-05-24 Thread Geoff Pack
If the image is a map, and you want to link areas of it, then an image map is the semantically correct solution. Faking them with lists and CSS is no better than using tables for layout IMHO. Geoff. == The

RE: [WSG] ive given up on css

2007-05-16 Thread Geoff Pack
Robert O'Rourke wrote: If you haven't clicked around wizwebz yet go to the 'what will it cost me' page for the best midi ever. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakety_Sax == The information contained in this email

RE: [WSG] Talking about tabular data...

2007-03-07 Thread Geoff Pack
table captionTable of Malcontents/caption thead tr thName/th thComments/th /tr /thead tbody tr tdMe/td tdIs this tabular

RE: [WSG] Re: Website Directory Structure - Best Practice

2006-03-20 Thread Geoff Pack
Vlad Alexander wrote: Nancy Johnson wrote: I believe best practices are to have all images in a directory entitled images Hi Nancy, I would not encourage this practice. There are two types of images on Web site - site level images (mostly used in page layout like logos,

RE: [WSG] Employee Hierarchy in CSS

2006-03-16 Thread Geoff Pack
Hi Sarah, I agree with Jay - it should be a nested list, but I'd avoid floats completely and use absolute positioning to lay it out. I'd also change the nesting to reflect the org structure, not just the level. Assuming the managers report to the GM, then: ul id=orgChart liMD

RE: [WSG] Employee Hierarchy in CSS

2006-03-16 Thread Geoff Pack
Sarah Peeke wrote: That looks great. I like the idea of the background image, and I especially like the mugshot! :) See: http://www.virtualgeoff.com/misc/orgChart.html with background image: http://www.virtualgeoff.com/misc/orgChartB.html A couple of thoughts: 1. Would it be

[WSG] Confusing the users...

2006-02-21 Thread Geoff Pack
Jason Turnbull wrote: Terrence Wood wrote: Jakob Nielsen responded to my request for clarification Jacob has used this request for his latest article http://www.useit.com/alertbox/within_page_links.html Regards Jason Ignoring the discussion of in-page links and jumping straight

RE: [WSG] new yahoo user interface library

2006-02-14 Thread Geoff Pack
Wow Ted, This is seriously cool. Haven't looked through it all yet, but I know I'm going to be using some of this code. The Graded Browser Support page http://developer.yahoo.net/yui/articles/gbs/gbs.html is particularly relevant for this forum. Thanks, Geoff Ted Drake wrote: Hi All

RE: [WSG] IE7 Compatibility Team

2006-02-09 Thread Geoff Pack
Cade Whitbourn wrote: Wow. Microsoft are taking very pro-active measures to assist the developer community in fixing sites for IE7. I received an email from someone on the 'IE7 compatibility team' with a screenshot of our site in IE7 and a list of all our stylesheets with all the

RE: [WSG] Which unit is better for web site font size?

2006-02-02 Thread Geoff Pack
Pixels per inch (PPI) That's what I like about standards. The rest of the world uses the Metric system, yet we are stuck with these archaic units because the U.S. refuses to get with the program. How's that for a 'moral high horse'? ;) cheers, Geoff. -Original Message- From:

RE: [WSG] The dilemma: tabular data with sublevels

2006-01-29 Thread Geoff Pack
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Also worth considering as an alternative: break it down into a two-step process. Show the nested list, with the items as links. Clicking the link takes you to the specific page about that item, with options to add/edit/delete. Do both: single link for

RE: [WSG] Google and HTML5

2006-01-26 Thread Geoff Pack
Christian Montoya wrote: On 1/25/06, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We could have: html head/head body header/header nav/nav article/article aside/aside footer/footer

RE: [WSG] The dilemma: tabular data with sublevels

2006-01-26 Thread Geoff Pack
How about this: style type=text/cssli span {float:right; margin-right:30%;}/style ul lispan[ Add | Edit | Delete ] /spanItem 1 ul lispan[ Add | Edit | Delete ] /spanSubItem 1.1 ul lispan[ Add | Edit | Delete ] /spanSubItem 1.1.1/li

RE: [WSG] Google and HTML5

2006-01-25 Thread Geoff Pack
I like the idea of the nav and the aside elements: http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-nav http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-aside So instead of: html head/head body div id=header/div div id=nav/div

RE: [WSG] IE float quest

2005-12-19 Thread Geoff Pack
Tee, I suspect the problem is the IE box model. You have set a width and padding for #formWrapper. Increasing the width of the #container by 20px, which is the amount of padding on the #formWrapper, seems to fix the problem. #container { width: 825px; ...} cheers, Geoff.

RE: [WSG] IE float quest -SOLVED

2005-12-19 Thread Geoff Pack
, Geoff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of tee Sent: Monday, 19 December 2005 9:53 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] IE float quest -SOLVED On Dec 19, 2005, at 1:40 AM, Geoff Pack wrote: Tee, I suspect

RE: [WSG] Pipe separated lists

2005-12-12 Thread Geoff Pack
To reply to a few people at once: Daisy wrote: You can hear the recorded output from JAWS of vertical pipes (and other commonly used separator characters) in Peter Krantz's article, The Sound of the Accessible Title Tag Separator,

[WSG] Pipe separated lists (was: CSS foul-up in IE)

2005-12-11 Thread Geoff Pack
Joshua Street wrote: Can you possibly ditch the un-semantic pipe separators (|) and just use border-right:1px solid #000; on the li elements? That would probably help... Are the pipe separators really un-semantic? They have a long history of being used in navigation menus, and definitely

RE: [WSG] Pipe separated lists (was: CSS foul-up in IE)

2005-12-11 Thread Geoff Pack
Christian Montoya wrote: If you heard what pipe separators sound like in a screen reader, you wouldn't think they were semantic. Just because they have a long history doesn't make them machine-readable. Well, I have heard what they sound like when Opera reads them out, which is no biggie.

RE: [WSG] Pipe separated lists (was: CSS foul-up in IE)

2005-12-11 Thread Geoff Pack
Samuel Richardson wrote: Why are you using pipes in the first place? Why is a li with border-right : 1px solid black; styled on it and spaced out with margins and padding not sufficient? This smacks of using nbsp; for layout. Why? because it's more concise, uses less bandwidth, and

RE: [WSG] Pipe separated lists (was: CSS foul-up in IE)

2005-12-11 Thread Geoff Pack
Christian Montoya wrote: ... - I don't care how a page looks with CSS off, as long as a list really looks like a list And what does a list really look like? Which of the following is more correct: My favourite fruits are watermelon, apples and bananas. My favourite fruits are: *

RE: [WSG] Pipe separated lists

2005-12-11 Thread Geoff Pack
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Geoff Pack wrote: As for lists, the pipe separated menu list is perfectly clear to most people. What is missing is a clean way to mark it up with HTML. You could use an unordered list, styled inline, but that is overkill in many cases, and not an useable

RE: [WSG] firefox 1.5 is official

2005-11-29 Thread Geoff Pack
Can someone explain what the new Canvas element does that SVG doesn't? And why is it a new element instead of just using the Object tag? Geoff. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

RE: [WSG] firefox 1.5 is official

2005-11-29 Thread Geoff Pack
+ DOM if you want to add things dynamically? Geoff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lachlan Hunt Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2005 11:36 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] firefox 1.5 is official Geoff Pack wrote

RE: [WSG] firefox 1.5 is official

2005-11-29 Thread Geoff Pack
Thanks. much clearer now. Geoff. Ted Drake wrote: Try this http://overstimulate.com/projects/canvas/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on

RE: [WSG] CSS Validators

2005-11-28 Thread Geoff Pack
Alan Trick wrote: Is there a problem with this: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/DOWNLOAD.html Only that it's written in Java - the server admins here would prefer something else. It looks like we will have to go with it anyway, as we can't find any alternatives. Thanks also for the

RE: [WSG] starting ordered lists from a number other than 1

2005-11-23 Thread Geoff Pack
Paul Noone wrote: Also, and I'll probably get lynched for this but the following should also work in a transiational doctype. ol li value=40/li ... Not for using it, just for not quoting it properly ;) ** The discussion

[WSG] CSS Validators

2005-11-23 Thread Geoff Pack
Does anyone know of a downloadable CSS validator (other than the W3C one) that I can install on an local server to batch check files on my local network? We currently use the WDG html validator, but their CSS validator is not available for download. Cheers Geoff Pack

RE: [WSG] starting ordered lists from a number other than 1

2005-11-22 Thread Geoff Pack
:) Geoff Pack Somaya Langley wrote: Hi All - I'm putting together a template for a contents list page for the National Library of Australia's online pictures delivery system. We need to start an ordered list on a page from a number other than 1, as the lists could be quite long and so

RE: [WSG] jump menu method

2005-11-21 Thread Geoff Pack
Nice script. What sort of attribution would you like if I borrow it? Geoff. Lachlan Hardy wrote: Herrod, Lisa wrote: can you send a link to an example of one of these? Try this one: http://www.business.vic.gov.au/ Hopefully, you'll forgive the lack of validation - not our

RE: [WSG] CSS filesize and selector names

2005-11-11 Thread Geoff Pack
Anders Nawroth wrote: Mixing lower/uppercase enhances readability, just remember to write it the same way everywhere, class names and ID's are case sensitive. I tend to prefer hyphens, like #btn-save hyphens? bah! .realCoders use #camelCase

RE: [WSG] Font resizing

2005-11-09 Thread Geoff Pack
It is on the news story pages, but not the homepage. Strangely enough though, the small font size in the stories is bigger than the default size on the home page. Geoff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Felix Miata Sent: Thursday, 10

RE: [WSG] Unstyling named anchors

2005-10-31 Thread Geoff Pack
Martin J. Lambert wrote: Actually, when using XHTML Strict, name is not a valid attribute for anchors. You can use the id attribute to get the same jump-to-that- section-of-the-page behaviour, but this will work with *any* element, not just anchors. Since you don't want the appearance of a

RE: [WSG] Set min-width using DOM

2005-10-21 Thread Geoff Pack
o.k., so how do you go about setting both max- and min-width at the same time? I tried: width:80%; max-width:600px; min-width:400px; width:expression(((document.documentElement.clientWidth)) 500 ? '400px' : '80%');

RE: [WSG] Strange width/padding/margin issue with IE5 for Mac

2005-10-20 Thread Geoff Pack
Well done. One last thing: the navigation list is 60px off to the left in IE 5 Mac Win. You need to explicitly set both the padding and margins for lists and list items to get them to behave consistently across browsers, as they have different default values. To fix: 1. remove the 60px

RE: [WSG] Strange width/padding/margin issue with IE5 for Mac

2005-10-17 Thread Geoff Pack
Adam, I had a quick look in IE 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 and both pages looked the same on all three. On IE6 Win the heading drops below the main photo, but on FF it doesn't. I would start by getting the rendering the same on IE6 and FF and then see what's happening with IE5 Mac. General comments: 1.

RE: [WSG] Couple of question - Image Map etc.

2005-10-16 Thread Geoff Pack
Andy Kirkwood wrote: A single image loads faster than the same cut into separate images. HTTP requires a new connection to be made to the server for each file (i.e. image). Even when the single image filesize is the same as the sum of the individual files, reconnecting to download each

RE: [WSG] IE team says no to hacks

2005-10-13 Thread Geoff Pack
Peter Firminger wrote: If you've gone against all sane advice and used CSS hacks then you knew exactly what you were in for with future browsers and potential problems. ... Sorry for the smug told you so, but many people including myself have made this very clear over the whole life of

RE: [WSG] css for ie4/ie5

2005-10-13 Thread Geoff Pack
Standalone versions of IE 4 and IE 5 are available at http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone. These will work even if you have a later version of IE installed. cheers, Geoff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rhys Burnie Sent:

RE: [WSG] css for ie4/ie5

2005-10-13 Thread Geoff Pack
Sure. But if you are only testing your own sites, and not surfing the web with them, then it shouldn't be much of a risk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Firminger Sent: Friday, 14 October 2005 2:18 PM To:

RE: [WSG] Block element inside inline container

2005-09-19 Thread Geoff Pack
Scott, Have you tried printing this page? If you are going to do the hover thing, make sure you add a print stylesheet with them all visible at once. cheers, Geoff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Glasgow Sent: Tuesday, 20

RE: [WSG] The Big Lie about CSS

2005-09-18 Thread Geoff Pack
Sorry to be thick, I get it now. I guess you have to use the SSI if you want to be absolutely sure. Though if you are only changing the styles, does it matter? The content will still be correct (unless the html is also cached...) cheers, Geoff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [WSG] td != div

2005-09-08 Thread Geoff Pack
. 6. Laziness and deadlines. Sometimes it takes a lot of effort to make things simple. Not always worth it. cheers -- Geoff Pack Developer ABC New Media -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenny Graham Sent: Wednesday, 7 September 2005 9:31

RE: [WSG] td != div

2005-09-06 Thread Geoff Pack
. 6. Laziness and deadlines. Sometimes it takes a lot of effort to make things simple. Not always worth it. cheers -- Geoff Pack Developer ABC New Media -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenny Graham Sent: Wednesday, 7 September 2005 9:31

RE: [WSG] site not looking good in Mozilla/FF!

2005-09-06 Thread Geoff Pack
] center_col, right_col, [clear] footer close wrapper 4. top_bar: right-align the text instead of using all that left padding. hope this helps... cheers, -- Geoff Pack Developer ABC New Media -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [WSG] Online Resources for HTML Beginners

2005-08-28 Thread Geoff Pack
John, If they want to be coders, then send them straight to the source, and show them how to find the specs: http://www.w3.org/ Particularly: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/ and: http://validator.w3.org/ Geoff. -Original Message- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 29 August 2005 10:14

RE: [WSG] IFrame Question

2005-08-21 Thread Geoff Pack
What IFrame? There is no IFrame in your page. But there are a few ways to do what you want: 1. You can use javascript to change the image source. 2. You can put both images in the page in separate divs and hide one - then use a show/hide script to swap the divs over. 3. You can put the images

RE: [WSG] New front page for http://abc.net.au/

2005-08-04 Thread Geoff Pack
. BTW, if there is anything that particularly annoys (or pleases) you, send feedback via the contact form if you want it formally logged. We do make changes based on feedback we receive. cheers, Geoff Pack Developer, ABC New Media and Digital Services

RE: [WSG] New front page for http://abc.net.au/

2005-08-04 Thread Geoff Pack
found in both Firefox Safari is that when I increase the font size the search box and its button disappear from the page. Hope Stewart On 4/8/05 7:18 PM, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Thanks for all the comments on the new ABC home page. I did the front-end

RE: [WSG] there is no attribute name

2005-05-15 Thread Geoff Pack
Michael Cordover wrote: Yup, same mechanism. The #anchor has *always* referred to an id in the spec, referring to a name as a bit of an extra feature (read: incompatibility included for fun). That's a bit arse backwards. 'Name' has been the target of #anchors ('fragment identifiers') since

RE: [WSG] Text flow and two bottom aligned floats?

2005-05-12 Thread Geoff Pack
Not sure if it's possible to do precisely. To get the text to flow above and left means you will have to put the image inline in the text, which means they will jump around a bit depending on the font size and width of the text block. I got the following code to sort-of work by setting the

RE: [WSG] Text flow and two bottom aligned floats?

2005-05-12 Thread Geoff Pack
-05-13 at 13:11, Geoff Pack wrote: Not sure if it's possible to do precisely. To get the text to flow above and left means you will have to put the image inline in the text, which means they will jump around a bit depending on the font size and width of the text block. I got

RE: [WSG] Formatting tables

2005-05-10 Thread Geoff Pack
Try turning off all your styles and see if the table still makes sense. If not, then you need to add some table attributes. I find that it often helps to add a border in the html, but most of the time the default values for the other attributes are fine, and can be styled with CSS. cheers,