We currently use popup windows to provide an answer/feedback for an
activity/questionnaire. At one stage we were using hidden divs and JS to
"unhide" the div when the user hit a submit button, but from a usability
standpoint that was bad as it reset the page to the top (and so a
screenreader would
We currently use popup windows to provide an answer/feedback for an
activity/questionnaire. At one stage we were using hidden divs and JS to
"unhide" the div when the user hit a submit button, but from a usability
standpoint that was bad as it reset the page to the top (and so a
screenreader would
There's also the rumour of the "google browser bug" that was in Bugzilla
(but then was made private and no longer appears):
http://www.deftone.com/blogzilla/archives/google_browser.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Jason Turnbull
> Se
This thread has been a bit of deja vu for me. I have been discussing
this problem with an external developer who uses Satay, who doesn't seem
to believe that it is flaky. He has tested it across many browsers/OS's
and hasn't seen the problem, and therefore had difficulty believing
there is a prob.
Actually its worse than that - I didn't see this myself, but heard
second hand that on a machine where it didn't work they re-installed
Flash, and it started working fine. Some time later (after a reboot as
far as I know), the page started failing again. So not only not
non-reproducable across syst
Forgot to mention, I have seen it fail with the empty text box on IE6 as
well (not on the page mentioned below, but on our testing of Satay).
Ben.
> I used the "Satay" method on this page which validates to
> XHTML Strict. Works in IE, FireFox, Netscape 7.2, Opera 7.x
> on Win - not sure about o
Hi Johan,
That page fails (displays an empty text box) on Win98SE, IE5.5, Flash
7,0,1,9,0.
The big problem with Satay that I found is that on one machine it will
work fine, then on another with the exact same OS, IE and Flash versions
it fails with the empty text box problem. See the comments in th
As you said, both validating methods have issues, and AFAIK there is not
a more reliable method that is valid. I have recently been testing
Satay, and I have seen it fail on various setups, and have given up on
it. As David said, I think the answer to your question is "no".
> Can anyone recommend
Try
http://www.xat.com/wo/index.html
We've been using it and find it very helpful. I think you could set it
to "unlimited" speed to get just render times...
> I want to test the render speed (from initial request through to
> completion, and just the render once all files are cached) of some
> p
