Hi Stuart,
Looks OK in Safari 1.0, Firefox 1.0 and IE 5.2 (Mac OSX). The only
problems occur when I try to reduce the width of the window - although it
has to be a pretty dramatic reduction.
Safari Firefox both start to fall apart when the window gets to about
605px wide (minus chrome):
Looks fine here.
(Safari 1.0, Mac OSX 10.2.8)
Regards,
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/04/2005 02:16:51 PM:
I wonder if someone could confirm something for me. I
https://monitor.hpa.com.au/rta/
Strange... looks fine in Firefox 0.9.3 (Mac OSX) but in IE5.2, it's
completely unstyled!
Regards,
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
- Original Message -
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] Funny Left Margin in IE6
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
31/12/2004 08:21:00 AM
At the risk of getting this started up again... (I tend to read my WSG
emails in a batch every day or so.)
Mordechai Peller wrote on 06/12/2004 09:31:41 PM:
If breadcrumbs show where you are in the site you get:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
If, on the other had, they show
Mordechai Peller wrote on 06/12/2004 09:41:20 PM:
Patrick Lauke wrote:
...and discussing the finer points of semantics in a markup
language as coarse and unsuitable as HTML ends up being a tad futile
Futile? Perhaps sometimes. Though I must admit, when there is a good
reason to do so
I may be missing something here but when WinXP SP2 was installed on all
the PCs at work, all it seemed to block were (popup) windows that opened
automatically (i.e. onLoad). A link that requires a click, such as:
a href=http://google.com/; onclick=window.open(this.href,
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy: http://www.scottschiller.com/
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
14/11/2004 06:21:08 PM
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy: http://www.scottschiller.com/
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
14/11/2004 06:21:29 PM
Return Receipt
Your document:
[WSG] IE 6 Hover Bug?
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
04/10/2004 09:03:06 PM
Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/10/2004 10:54:20
AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, Consider this very simple HTML document:
...
How could leaving out the doctype make such a definite difference to
such
a simple page?
The crucial part of my answer was: If you know for
Peter Goddard wrote on 04/10/2004 11:10:07 PM:
I would recommend you read this short article.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/doctype/
IMHO the setting of a DOCTYPE is an essential step in the migration
to standards based web development. You have a valid point that if
you want to
Martin J. Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:28:07 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. However, I still don't understand WHY a
page requires a doctype declaration (in my case HTML 4.0
transitional) just to make a font-size style cascade from body
The URL has been changed to
http://www.elise.com/mt/archives/000767attacked.php (explanation on that
page).
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/10/2004 06:11:43 AM:
I was going to ask this question anyway, but then this thread started
about the place of doctypes...
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
If you know for sure that the markup is going to be invalid, why
bother
with a doctype at all? ...
OK, Consider this very simple HTML document:
!DOCTYPE HTML
MacOSX 10.2.8 - Firefox 0.9.3 Safari 1.0
http://fs.neester.com/ - Look pretty much the same here.
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/09/2004 05:03:15 PM:
On 9/17/04
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] My Favorite XHTML/CSS/_javascript_/PHP Editor - NO WYSIWYG
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
19/09/2004 09:09:42 AM
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] Ikon
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
01/08/2004 02:03:50 AM
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
Indiscrepancies = cross between indiscretions and discrepancies?
:-)
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
*
The discussion list for
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
11/05/2004 10:12:49 PM
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
This has nothing to do with removing bullets. In fact, it's got nothing to
do with HTML.
I just thought you should know that accommodation (2nd from the top)
should have 2 'm's. :-)
Regards,
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: voice-family (was Re: [WSG] Opera 7.20 released)
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
26/09/2003 10:18:29 AM
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
22 matches
Mail list logo
