Russ, please keep us updated with the light reading links. Thanks for your effort!
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Dory <nordicz...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree... keep sending the links! It is up to us as to what we chose to > read or not. > > Dory > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:06 AM, <agerasimc...@unioncentral.com> wrote: > >> >> Russ, >> >> Even though I have a lot of experience with GUI development and standards, >> and have my own opinions on things, I am reading your links everytime you >> send them out. Any article matters. Please, keep sending those. >> Thanks! >> >> Anya V. Gerasimchuk >> Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services >> UNIFI Information Technology >> agerasimc...@unioncentral.com >> (513) 595 -2391 >> >> >> *Russ Weakley <r...@maxdesign.com.au>* >> Sent by: li...@webstandardsgroup.org >> >> 12/22/2009 09:01 AM >> Please respond to >> wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >> >> To >> wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >> cc >> Subject >> Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) >> >> >> >> >> Hi Rimantas >> >> Why did I post this link? Because the article has an interesting take >> on HTML5. >> >> This does mean that I agree or disagree with the article. I hoped that >> the article would lead to discussion and debate. I had also hoped that >> any discussion or debate would be conducted in a respectful manor >> (regardless of how strongly one feels that the other party is >> incorrect) and that anyone involved in the discussion would present >> their arguments rationally and calmly without sinking to personal >> attacks on other web standards group members (yes, the person who >> wrote the article is a member of this group). >> >> Ahhh... I give up... there is no hope. >> >> Russ >> >> >> On 22/12/2009, at 10:46 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: >> >> >> Will HTML5 make the Web even more invalid? >> >> <http://rebuildingtheweb.com/en/html5-make-web-more-invalid/> >> > >> > Can you provide any reason why you keep posting links to this site? >> > Yes the blog _seems_ to be about web standards, but the posts >> > are just speculation of poor quality and based on the lack of >> > information, >> > misunderstanding and false assumptions. >> > >> > Sure, the guy has financial interest of keeping xhtml afloat, so he >> > may see the HTML5 as a threat, but that's not a good enough >> > reason to spout nonsense. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Rimantas >> > -- >> > http://rimantas.com/ >> >> >> >> ******************************************************************* >> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org >> ******************************************************************* >> >> >> >> ******************************************************************* >> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org >> ******************************************************************* >> > > > > -- > Dory Ptak > Ptak Web Development > www.ptakwebdevelopment.com > (925) 292-1054 > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
