On 2/28/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Same thing is happening on the PC.I have my nav text set to 1.0em.I have the height of each li set to 1.75em.I wrongly assumed that the li would expand along with the text sincethey both used ems for sizing...
i'm a bit of a newb here, but
On 2/24/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
your prob right but what about that flash as a css background someone wasposting about here a while back??this sounds interesting if it is possible. i was just working on something where this would have been useful, but i wasn't on the list when i
one of how the designer chose to implement the
accessibility of the site.
My 2 cents :)
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
ticular issue
http://teriadams.blogspot.com/2006/01/railroaded.html
But this is getting somewhat away from the topic of origin. Again, perhaps
those of us interested in this debate should take it off list?
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro
tion, no matter what "excuses" you wrap around
it.
And while for some people it's difficult to see the relationship between
that type of discrimination and non-accessible websites, the fact remains,
if you don't provide access, you're discriminating. And that is, in more
and ramble, this *is* a bit of a pet topic
of mine. Feel free to contact me in private to continue it if it's not
appropriate to this WSG list :)
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
ever, a person with a disability who has been doing a lot of grassroot
advocacy and work with/around the ADA, and web accessibility, for over a
decade now.
Cheers, I hope my long mail hasn't bored you to tears
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
rant, could people who are out of the office go NOMAIL
from the list, It's getting VERY tiresome to get all those "I'm out of the
office" mails...
Cheers
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
up with a bigger mess than we find ourselves in now. How long have
and been deprecated? Why are some editors still using it? Do you
*really* think that a re-specification will catch on?
Don't' get me wrong, I'm glad to see "action" on those fronts, but I'm not
su
want to use
*some* images in your handheld styles (and no, I'm not contradicting myself
;) )
Cheers
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on p
anyway).
Use bold colours, try to keep in the "web safe" range. While we can get
away from using web safe colours anymore for the PC (in most cases), the
screen quality of handhelds still leave to be desired, and you're better off
keeping within that web safe range.
In
> Thankfully, Explorer isn't the only HH browser ;-)
Ya, but... If you want your visitors to see the site properly, considering
the majority of HH ship with IE, you can't expect them know how to change
browsers. They rarely do on their PC to start with, on the HH is even worse
;)
tory).
For example, even if you declare a stylesheet for media=handheld, Explorer
for the handheld will still use some of the screen stylesheet. This makes
it near impossible designing a proper style for handhelds.
Good luck
Nic
**
The discussi
."
I think that should answer your question ;)
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
someone on a project like that a few months
back.
I wish you luck!
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
> I was wondering if the professionals in here can recommend any free CSS
Editors
TopStyle Lite
http://www.bradsoft.com/download/index.asp
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.
idea about where the link leads you.
> PS. it validates..
:) Probably does, but not with all standards ;)
Cheers, good luck
Nic
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines
n of working on a site and make sure it complies, only to be faced
by sites slapping "compliance labels" on themselves that don't meet
criteria. Not trully a big deal, but frustrating nonetheless.
> (I don't know about you, but I'm so busy
y not a clue of what they are doing, how can
a potential client be sure that the next guy (you, me) claiming they know
what they are doing actually does?
Perhaps this is a pointless rant, but it's seriously getting under my skin
this week.
Thanks for any
19 matches
Mail list logo
