Certainly a big step in the right directions, but still two simple
warnings that could be fixed and it is only Transitional.
Regards,
Ric
designer wrote:
http://www.nikonnet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Whilst stats can tell some stories, your question is almost one of those
how long is a piece of string? types. Screen resolutions vary with
target audiences. I have clients with agricultural based sites where I
am still getting reports of screens at 640 x 480! Don't forget either
that the
Try this Al
#content {
padding: 10px;
margin:5px auto;
background-color: #fff;
border: 1px solid #000;
width: 70%; /* remove this because you are setting your margin to auto*/
}
Regards,
Ric
Al Kendall wrote:
Can anyone please tell me how to fix the following script to get the
div the
.
Thanks for the correction.
Regards,
Ric
Ben Wong wrote:
On 12/14/05, Ric Jude Raftis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this Al
#content {
padding: 10px;
margin:5px auto;
background-color: #fff;
border: 1px solid #000;
width: 70%; /* remove this because you are setting your margin to auto
Yes, I have and in my humble opinion, poor design. Px heights for fonts
are not recommended and will cause problems with higher resolution
monitors at 96px and in future above.
Recommendations are to set font sizes at percentages or ems. I set my
font size to 100% in my body of the css and
Well it seems you must have fixed it because Cynthia Says is passing
you at Triple A.
Regards,
Ric
Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi,
I thought I've done everything correct with my forms... but no.
So now I'm trying to figure out why Cynthia/WEBXACT fails my form
pages. I just don't understand what
Makes it interesting when you are trying to sell clients "validated"
code and web sites if they ask "does Google have validated code?".
Regards,
Ric
James Ellis wrote:
Hi
Having a valid frontend has nothing to do with whether an organisation
attempts to be socially responsible. I'm
G'day Julia,
Firefox is actually not displaying properly either. Your text is quite
small on the page, so if you hit Control and the plus key a few times to
enlarge it you'll see what happens to your footer area.
I also note you have two doctypes in your code. One for xhtml and one
for
Now that is a pearl Mark! Is it copyrightLOL.
Regards,
Ric
Mark Harris wrote:
You can lead a client to knowledge, but you can't make them think!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
You are absolutely correct Andreas. Bit the same as an Australian
Safety Standard, or Certificate of Electrical Compliance and the myriad
of other bits of pieces of terminology and standards that we live with
every day. But if we don't educate the public, how will they ever
learn. The tag
G'day Donna,
The continuing fight against the incompetent and uncaring! Would they
allow their children to play with toys that didn't meet Australian
Safety Standards (or whatever country you're in)? Then why have a site
that doesn't meet world standards for web design?
Regards,
Ric
I've only recently joined this group and I find this an interesting
discussion because it is a daily challenge for designers who are
desperately trying to do the right thing. I'm sure we would all love to
see the back of the cowboys in the industry who throw a Frontpage site
together with no
12 matches
Mail list logo
