Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-14 Thread Ian Anderson
Felix Miata wrote: The author here is the lead layout developer in the Mozilla project: http://dbaron.org/log/2005-12#e20051228a Well, I don't read anything in the author's cited reference for CSS floats - http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#floats - to imply that floats were intended

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-14 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
... I don't think the Baron reference is sufficient evidence for the assertion that using floats for layout is an abuse of them. On the contrary, I have seen several references in the last few years that stated floats *were* the preferred layout method by the W3C CSS working group. ... I am

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Felix Miata
On 06/03/13 21:35 Paula Petrik apparently typed: When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute positioning. For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text or images. It seems, however, that floats

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Todd Baker
The main reason I dont use absolute positioning for all my layout is that most of the sites I build require footers at the base of the page content. With every page of differing content length the only way to achieve this is to float and then clear for the footer. Thats just me. There are wiser

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Paula Petrik wrote: When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute positioning. For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text or images. It seems, however, that floats have become the order of the

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Paula Petrik wrote: When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute positioning. For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text or images. It seems, however, that

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Richard Czeiger
) - Original Message - From: Paula Petrik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:35 PM Subject: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe) When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the planet), it seems

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Paula Petrik
Felix Todd, Felix, nice to know that I'm in good company. Todd and Phillipe, I think that the footer business is the sticking point. But what is sacred about a footer? What information goes into a footer that could not go elsewhere? This has me puzzled. In the table days, the most

Re: [WSG] Absolute Positioning-A Naive Question (Maybe)

2006-03-13 Thread Al Sparber
Paula Petrik wrote: When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute positioning. For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text or images. It seems, however, that floats have become the order of the