Re: [WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-06 Thread Mordechai Peller
Andrew Krespanis wrote: Opinions? Oh, we've all got lots of those... That's what I was hoping for (even though it'll be to late for my current project). Personally, I'd go with number 3. (Is this a SimpleQuiz? Do we get a book :D) The similarity to a "Simple Quiz" did occur to me. As far as

Re: [WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-06 Thread Andrew Krespanis
> I'm not looking for an answer, for I'm not sure there even is a > "right" answer; what I am looking for are opinions. In the end I'll make > my own decision, but with the help of other opinions I hope to make a > better decision. Opinions? Oh, we've all got lots of those... Personally, I'd go wi

Re: [WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-05 Thread Mordechai Peller
Kristof Neirynck wrote: You've got php, right? Sorry, but your answer is irrelevant as it completely ignores my question. I wasn't asking "HOW" to make it work. I am already skilled in CSS, JavaScript, and PHP and the methods suggested by the evolt article are good for a beginner, but I find

Re: [WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-05 Thread Kristof Neirynck
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:24:09 +0200, Mordechai Peller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm building an expanding menu and I'm trying to decide the best route > to take. The idea is that by clicking on an item it will either be a [snip] > If JavaScript isn't available the menus will either default to all

[WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-05 Thread Mordechai Peller
I'm building an expanding menu and I'm trying to decide the best route to take. The idea is that by clicking on an item it will either be a link or open the sub-menu. The problem come in for the sub-menu headings and IE's lack of support for :hover. So here are the options: 1) Heading; 2) Headi