Chris Stratford wrote:
What are your first thoughts?
I think I could pwn j00 at CS-S :)
Thanks!!
Oh, nice layout, but I can't see any image replacement, and I'm not sure
about setting the menu font to bold on hover... I'd change the
background instead
Fonts scale nicely
Overall... 9/10
Lost
Increasing font size sends your content overlapping the left page
margin with the shadowing.
Graham Cook
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on
At 04:22 PM 1/30/2005, Chris Stratford wrote:
...
Also the Dates on the right side of the titles, I used a method like this:
dtTitle Here emdate here/em/dt
so without styles, the title and date are easy to differentiate and also -
it gives me the em tag to position the date :)
Chris,
I think
Sorry that may be confusing.
the lines:
OLDER POST...
OLDER POST...
OLDER POST...
OLDER POST...
OLDER POST...
are ONE post.
:)
just filler.
counldnt be bothered www.lipsum.com it :)
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 04:22 PM 1/30/2005, Chris Stratford wrote:
...
Also the Dates on the right side of the
Hi Chris,
Looks pretty good to me. Looks very good in fact. Just one tiny niggle.
If images are turned off but style sheets are used, your footer links
are invisible, as is your title link! I'm fairly certain this isn't a
good thing ;). This is why the img alt= method is generally used,
Hey Michael,
Hmm...
Good point.
I will need to try and think up a way around that :S
Can you give me an example of when Images are not turned on but
Stylesheets are...??
The reason why I did it the way I have is so if a screenreader read over
it then it would be readable.
Also if I want to have
