Thank you. This is a very helpful answer.
At 12:08 AM 5/10/2004, Ryan Christie wrote:
YoYoEtc wrote:
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it
as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do?
Server-side languages such as PHP or ASP. JS is a client lan
Return Receipt
Your document:
Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?
was received by:
Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU
at:
11/05/2004 10:12:49 PM
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
YoYoEtc wrote:
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put
it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do?
As a rule of thumb, never trust anything to JavaScript except in the
following cases:
1) You have control of the environment (intranet, sever si
YoYoEtc wrote:
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put
it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do?
Server-side languages such as PHP or ASP. JS is a client language
because it's dependant on a user's browser to supply the processing
power for
Please see the following:
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp?
> I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ...
> but is there a statistic on how many users actually disable it in their
> browsers? Is it possible to sniff that out, and if so, how many
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it as
an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do?
At 11:23 PM 5/9/2004, Ryan Christie wrote:
I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ...
but is there a statistic on how many users a
I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ...
but is there a statistic on how many users actually disable it in their
browsers? Is it possible to sniff that out, and if so, how many users
per group are we talking about?
-Ryan
**