Quoting Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Christian Montoya wrote:
http://www.nikonnet.com/
Here we go with the tiny text again... Or am I the only
one who has trouble reading that text?
You're not. Even on 200% zoom its too small for me. More than that and
the overlapping makes it totally use
Christian Montoya wrote:
>> http://www.nikonnet.com/
> Here we go with the tiny text again. This is a decent website as far
> as standards go, but the design still looks dated. Or am I the only
> one who has trouble reading that text?
You're not. Even on 200% zoom its too small for me. More tha
Here we go with the tiny text again. This is a decent website as far
as standards go, but the design still looks dated. Or am I the only
one who has trouble reading that text?
And yes, the layout table on the page could have been handled with
divs. Someone got lazy.
--
--
Christian Montoya
chris
Certainly a big step in the right directions, but still two simple
warnings that could be fixed and it is only Transitional.
Regards,
Ric
designer wrote:
http://www.nikonnet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Shame about the layout table on the front page. It validates, though
with a pair of warnings I thought would make things fail... apparently
not (but then who actually believes the validator anyway, hey? ;-))
Josh
On 12/15/05, designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.nikonnet.com/
>
> --
>
http://www.nikonnet.com/
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to