Hello all,
Can anyone tell me if server-side includes - ColdFusion specifically -
would adversely effect search engines/spiders at all? An SEO company we
are trying is telling us that our CF includes will effect our SE
rankings.
TIA
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia
Can anyone tell me if server-side includes - ColdFusion specifically -
would adversely effect search engines/spiders at all?
I can't see how - the includes are parsed by the server before the page is
completely rendered to the UA, just as PHP. Any content or links in the
includes would be fully
Right... The bot can't find out, if the page is a static HTML file or
dynamically generated output by some sort of server-side technology...
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for
JohnyB wrote:
Right... The bot can't find out, if the page is a static HTML file or
dynamically generated output by some sort of server-side technology...
One can easily establish that by looking at the HTTP response times, the
file extension (if content negotiation, NSAPI/ISAPI filters, or
Why?
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
On Jan 4, 2005, at 3:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On search engines like Google there will be an adverse effect on
optimization when using coldfusion. Remember Google is a
Hypertextual Web Search Engine
On search engines like Google there will be an adverse effect on
optimization when using coldfusion. Remember Google is a
Hypertextual Web Search Engine
http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
I was ignoring this thread as off-topic, but this brings up an on-topic
point.
ColdFusion
Collin Davis wrote:
Google can, and others are going to be joining them soon. It's a simple
matter of using the Flash Search Engine SDK - it includes an application
called swf2html which dumps out text and links from .swf files and returns
as html.
When I put Flash in my documents, I am guilty of
Ben Curtis wrote:
In fact, I serve all my ColdFusion pages as .html because I migrated a
static site to ColdFusion and it was easier to tell Apache to send .html
file to ColdFusion than to change all the extensions and links.
Wouldn't that cause a processing overhead if you ever wanted to serve
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:14:25 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Curtis wrote:
In fact, I serve all my ColdFusion pages as .html because I migrated a
static site to ColdFusion and it was easier to tell Apache to send .html
file to ColdFusion than to change all the extensions and
Hi all.
As Tom has suggested, no more on this subject on the list please.
Thanks
James
--
admin
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:30:47 -0500, Tom Livingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Before the paddle is wielded, I remind that I did quickly post a reply
to my initial post stating this was OT and
10 matches
Mail list logo
