On 04/11/05, Julián Landerreche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at some pages where for the website name is only used in
> the homepage. Then, in internal/content pages, the usually goes for the
> section name or the article title.
>
> Of course, this second approach seems to need a li
Hi. Thanks to everyone that give me advices about how
to use headings (and how to dont mess nor waste them). and
I hope to hear few more approachs about how to use headings
consistently across homepage and internal pages.
AND WEBSITE NAME/TITLE
I wouldn't recommend using an for the website
Hi Julián,
SEMANTICS EXTRACTOR
Sometimes a view that approximates the semantics
of the content can be useful. Fortunately the W3C
have just such a tool: <
http://www.w3.org/2003/12/semantic-extractor.html >.
This will likely affirm Paul's point regarding an
as a 'parent' to an element (i.
There's nothing wrong with:
My site title
...navigation...
My section name
Latest Articles
Article 1 Title
paragraph
Article 2 Title
paragraph
Another option is:
My site title
...navigation...
My section name
Latest Articles
Hi there,
One reason there is so much debate is the HTML 4.01 spec actually
whimps out of making a call ;) In other words, it doesn't actually say
if skipping a level is wrong; it just says "some people" think it's
wrong.
What the spec DOES say is that the headings are ordered from 1 to 6 in
orde
r your articles.
Your
suggested use of headings in the classic markup example you provided is
correct.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julián
LanderrecheSent: Thursday, 3 November 2005 9:16 AMTo:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: [WSG] advices for using
I know this is a topic that often
comes back to the list. Well, it comes back
again.
I'm having some troubles when trying to think how headings should be
used, and I'm always thinking about simplify the site structure, but
that simplification always seems to mean "strip out content".
Summary o
