It's just that you lose any semantic value in using a table without
the . Using the table with currently limits your layout
options.
Using means you can retain a bit of semantic meaning (by linking
the name, icon and info at least) and get your styling right.
This thread is getting a bit like a
if it's a must to use then I have to sacrifice layout by using
Patrick's code
or sacrifice semantic by using
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on pos
On 30 Oct 2005, at 11:43 PM, Jad Madi wrote:
I'm not sure if i'm going to use defining trick, what I know about
standards markup and symantic, is to use the tag by it's meaning
rather than by How it look like,
If that is so, can you do any better with your class names than
'pinktext' and 'bo
Jad,
If you were going to use a table for displaying users, then Patrick's
sample markup is the way to go.
As far as I can see, the sample code you return uses the table purely
for layout purposes. Whilst using an unordered list is the
semantically correct way to mark-up the list of posts, puttin
Ok, I was basing my last post on the pdf. Things change a bit if
you're throwing in a list of posts and stuff.
> I agree with Jachin. The most semantic way of doing it would be:
>
>
> Name
> Info
>
> Name
> Info
>
>
**
The discussion
I agree with Jachin. The most semantic way of doing it would be:
Name
Info
Name
Info
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the li
Here is the actual markup for table
NOTE:
I'm not using because I don't want it to appear visually,
but I'm not sure if that would break standards or not, so please
advise.
Name
Post # 1
Post # 2
Post # 3
Post # 4
Post # 5
Vote * ** *** *
Jad Madi wrote:
I'm not sure if i'm going to use defining trick, what I know about
standards markup and symantic, is to use the tag by it's meaning
rather than by How it look like,
thats why i was consufed if it's a list or table, because I'm listing
users , and at the same time I have more than
I'm not sure if i'm going to use defining trick, what I know about
standards markup and symantic, is to use the tag by it's meaning
rather than by How it look like,
thats why i was consufed if it's a list or table, because I'm listing
users , and at the same time I have more than two cells, and mo
A definition list would be the best way to represent such data.
Can even be styled in the tabular layout in your example.
Scott McDaniel has an interesting article at
http://www.scottmcdaniel.com/?p=33 in which he undertakes a layout
similar to that you have proposed (example at
http://www.scottm
Jad Madi wrote:
guys, what do you think if this kind of organizing data
http://easyhttp.net/files/1.pdf - 17KB
is it tabular data? or a list?
At the moment it's tabular data, but the layout is not reflecting
that...it's a layout table.
Tabular would be something like
IconNameDescriptio
guys, what do you think if this kind of organizing data
http://easyhttp.net/files/1.pdf - 17KB
is it tabular data? or a list?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for s
12 matches
Mail list logo
