Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Rajib Mukherji
overflow:hidden simply suggests that whetever text/image  if overflows  will be automatically get hidden and hence the case. So read it like if something overflows it should  be hidden :) --- On Thu, 2/11/10, Jody Tate wrote: From: Jody Tate Subject: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

RE: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Thierry Koblentz
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] > On Behalf Of Jody Tate > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:05 PM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden > > Exactly. The magic co

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Jody Tate
Exactly. The magic confounds me. http://staff.washington.edu/jtate/overflow.html (I threw together the above example quickly. (Yes, embedded styles are a no-non, but it was easy to do in this situation.) Thanks a ton for the quirksmode link. It helps demystify the mystery. -jody On Feb 10

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Christian Snodgrass
Ah, that. Yeah... magic. I think that is actually a sort of bug or artifact that occurs from the need to calculate the dimensions of the container in order to hide properly. - Christian On 2/10/2010 4:42 PM, akella wrote: Apparently he is talking about overflow:hidden as a clearing floats f

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread akella
Apparently he is talking about overflow:hidden as a clearing floats fix. ( http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html) Let me reformulate the question: why the property that serves for hiding smth just make the wrapper stretch to accomodate containing floats. As for me - i still consider this mag

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden - ADMIN

2010-02-10 Thread Russ Weakley
My apologies all. This charming individual has been removed from the list. No need to comment on this and add unwanted noise to the list... As you were. Thanks russ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidel

RE: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Dj Tebbo
fuck off sendin me shit _ We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ **

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Christian Snodgrass
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Could you put together a quick example to illustrate. Basically what overflow: hidden does is anything that doesn't fit into it's given container is hidden, basically meaning that it doesn't affect the height of it's container. This only works if t

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Joseph Taylor
If I understand correctly, you're suggesting that that "overflow:hidden" doesn't hide overflow? My own use of "overflow:hidden" has only been in conjunction with a stated height. In this case "overflow:hidden" hides anything that goes beyond the stated height of the element the rule has been a

[WSG] the mysteries of overflow: hidden

2010-02-10 Thread Jody Tate
(I'm a list lurker. Also, apologies if this has been covered before.) In CSS, setting a div to "overflow: hidden" solves a problem it shouldn't--at least from the name of the property and value, it seems like it shouldn't. Often I'll have text, e.g. an h1, overflowing its containing/parent div,