Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-05 Thread Luc
Good evening James, It was foretold that on 5-2-2004 @ 14:34:33 GMT+1100 (which was 4:34:33 where I live) James Cowperthwaite would mumble: JC> The right image now slides over the top of the left instead of breaking and going onto a JC> new line. JC> Maybe not the best way to do it though

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-04 Thread James Cowperthwaite
Ok, if anyone is interested, I decided to go down the 'sliding doors' (http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/) path, which has given me the result I was hoping for. The right image now slides over the top of the left instead of breaking and going onto a new line. Maybe not the best

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-04 Thread Luc
Good afternoon James, It was foretold that on 4-2-2004 @ 15:28:41 GMT+1100 (which was 5:28:41 where I live) James Cowperthwaite would mumble: JC> With two images, one floated left and the right, is there any way to JC> force the page scroll horizontally instead of the right image dropping

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread James Cowperthwaite
Umm, I dont think so, but I am not really sure what that is - guessing IE iFrame thingy? If so then probably not :-) Thanks James On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 17:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi james, you don't want to use an Inline frame?, > > that would fix your problem , but then again, goes agai

RE: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread James Cowperthwaite
Yeah, could be that I am a bit stuffed :-) I will just have to make the two images as skinny as I can and hope that no-one is viewing under 640x480... ps that min-width worked a treat in Mozilla :-) Thanks James On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:26, Lindsay Evans wrote: > James Cowperthwaite wrote: > >

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread info
Hi james, you don't want to use an Inline frame?, that would fix your problem , but then again, goes against the code principles you are applying. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ ***

RE: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread Lindsay Evans
James Cowperthwaite wrote: > Ah yes, but the effect that I am going for is to have one image sits > flush left, while the other is flush right... They get closer and > closer as the browser gets smaller. > > This works fine until the browser until the browser window gets too > small, which is real

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread James Cowperthwaite
Ah yes, but the effect that I am going for is to have one image sits flush left, while the other is flush right... They get closer and closer as the browser gets smaller. This works fine until the browser until the browser window gets too small, which is really only an issue (in this case) if the

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread Lucian Teo
If the page is to be set 100% of the viewport, which is 600px, the combined 800px of the two logos would definitely cause the second to fall below the first logo. You'll need to encase the two logos in a container that is at least 800px wide for the two to sit side by side. Lucian On Feb 4, 2

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

2004-02-03 Thread Cameron Adams
Well, it's always going to float to the right of whatever's containing it, so if the container is only set to the browser width (100%) it'll collapse. -- Cameron W: www.themaninblue.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! h