Great
comments Mordechai
It's
easy to miss some of these elements, such as title tags. I like using the
web development bar by Chris Pederick
http://www.chrispederick.com/work/firefox/webdeveloper/ in
Mozilla. I use the outline links without titles, images without alt,
titles, etc funct
Andreas Boehmer wrote: Hi guys,I was wondering whether you could
give me some feedback on a website we havecreated: http://www.jet.org.au.We have tried to make it as
accessible as possible, but better than anyBobby or W3C validation is
probably going through your critique. We arestil
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
Hi guys,
I was wondering whether you could give me some feedback on a website we have
created: http://www.jet.org.au.
We have tried to make it as accessible as possible, but better than any
Bobby or W3C validation is probably going through your critique. We are
still
> > I was wondering whether you could give me some feedback on a website
> > we have
> > created: http://www.jet.org.au.
> From a quick glance, without looking at any code or styles...
> - the small type in the logo is virtually impossible to read (1280x1024
> 17" flat panel)... either you want p
quite good in terms of speedy loading
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/cgi-bin/wso/wso.pl?url=http%3A//www.jet.org.au/phpFiles/index.php
However the CSS http://www.jet.org.au/css/JET.css could be optimised a lot
eg:
background-color:#fff;
background-image:url(../images/orange_left.gif);
backgroun
On 01/06/2004, at 11:26 AM, Andreas Boehmer wrote:
I was wondering whether you could give me some feedback on a website
we have
created: http://www.jet.org.au.
We have tried to make it as accessible as possible, but better than any
Bobby or W3C validation is probably going through your critique.