om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Milnes
Sent: 09 June 2004 12:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] meta http-equiv
> The correct content type or MIME type for an XHTML document is
> "application/xhtml+xml". Although I might add internet explor
Alan Milnes wrote:
The correct content type or MIME type for an XHTML document is
"application/xhtml+xml".
Although I might add internet explorer doesn't understand it so you need
to determine if the users browser accepts it.You can do this in PHP by
writing:
: SNIP:
The suggested meth
> The correct content type or MIME type for an XHTML document is
> "application/xhtml+xml".
> Although I might add internet explorer doesn't understand it so you need
> to determine if the users browser accepts it.You can do this in PHP by
> writing:
: SNIP:
The suggested method doesn't
Nope sorry,
> The correct content type or MIME type for an XHTML document is
> "application/xhtml+xml".
This (mime type issue) is only required for XHTML 1.1. You don't have to do
it for XHTML 1.0 Transitional (which the example was).
The answer to Jamie's original question is to have a look at
Marc Greenstock wrote:
The correct content type or MIME type for an XHTML document is
"application/xhtml+xml".
Although I might add internet explorer doesn't understand it so you
need to determine if the users browser accepts it.You can do this in
PHP by writing:
So how would you include the l
Jamie Mason wrote:
Hey,
just a quick question, is the below the correct markup for a
transitional XHTML document?
I thought the meta http-equiv was text/xhtml, so I've lost confidence
in the rest of the code being correct also.
Thanks a lot! Sorry to always be the one with the menial questions.
Title: meta http-equiv
Here’s the reference to W3C:
http://www.w3.org/International/O-charset.html
and
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_9
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au
Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/
-
