Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Hey dean, I am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not be picked up by the validation On 7/10/07, Dean Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exis

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Text-shadow's part of the CSS3 spec and not CSS 2.1 isn't it? So if you're validating against CSS 2.1, you'll get an error. On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:03:46 +1000, Dean Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Cameron Singe wrote: am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not be picked up by the validation Nope, your right. I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the curve ;-) Dean ***

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dean Matthews wrote: I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the curve ;-) Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you try to validate a file. Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh ***

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you try to validate a file. Yes I see, but how do you link a "Valid CSS" icon to an advanced search? Thanks, Dean *

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released). So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able to appreciated your f

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Lucien Stals wrote: Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released). So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Lucien Stals wrote: Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. Yes, well it really is a let down viewing a site in Safari or OmniWeb and then viewing it in IE or FF. I am finding quite a few client

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On 10 Jul 2007, at 04:20, Dean Matthews wrote: On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you try to validate a file. Yes I see, but how do you link a "Valid CSS" icon to an advanced search? Validate it, then

RE: [WSG] Shadow validation

AM >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >Subject: Re: [WSG] Shadow validation > >Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream >browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can >only think of Safari 3, only available as the W