Hello All,
During the release of WSJTX-1.5-RC1, I missed the commits from Joe and
Bill that changed the WSJTX (devel) & (exp) branch and version numbers.
As a result, the output directories and some (most) of the on screen
messaging was wrong for WSJTX builds. I believe both systems sorted out
Hi Bill,
I'm glad you posted that, as I missed that change completely in the
shuffle. Will get things sorted around this evening.
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 04/22/2015 08:06 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> just to clarify a bit. I think Greg is referring to v1.6 as Joe's
> experimental branc
Thanks Bill, I'll give it a go.
Allan
VK4QG
-Original Message-
From: "Bill Somerville"
Sent: 23/04/2015 11:41
To: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.5-rc1 (Release Candidate 1) PTT problem
On 23/04/2015 00:47, Allan Downie wrote:
Hi Allan & All
>
Hi All,
just to clarify a bit. I think Greg is referring to v1.6 as Joe's
experimental branch and v1.5 as development. That is old news as of
Yesterday ;)
We have branched v1.5 which is now frozen for enhancements and out for
beta testers to try and break it.
The development branch ^/branches
Hi David,
Ok, no worries. As Bill said, v1.6 is going through "allot" of change,
so things may work one day and not the next.
I'd hang with v1.5 for until things settle out a bit in v1.6
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 04/22/2015 07:53 PM, David wrote:
> OK Bill no problemsjust doing my job as tester
OK Bill no problemsjust doing my job as tester
73 David VK4BDJ
On 23/04/15 11:50, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 23/04/2015 02:44, David wrote:
Hi David,
Forwarded Message
Subject:No ptt on odd
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:37:38 +1000
From: David
To: KI7MT
On 23/04/2015 02:44, David wrote:
Hi David,
Forwarded Message
Subject:No ptt on odd
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:37:38 +1000
From: David
To: KI7MT
Hi Gregthis is not a jtsdk problem.have upgraded WSJTX v1.6 and
it shows as WSJTX v1.6.1. PTT does
Forwarded Message
Subject:No ptt on odd
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:37:38 +1000
From: David
To: KI7MT
Hi Gregthis is not a jtsdk problem.have upgraded WSJTX v1.6 and
it shows as WSJTX v1.6.1. PTT does not work on odd minute but does
work on even
On 23/04/2015 00:47, Allan Downie wrote:
Hi Allan & All
Yes to both questions Bill. Win 7 and usual USB 4 port. I have just
heard from a friend VK4ZB, he has the same issue. He is using Win 7 also.
OK, I have tracked down the main issue with this PTT problem. You can
work around it for now by c
On 23/04/2015 00:47, Allan Downie wrote:
Hi Allan,
Yes to both questions Bill. Win 7 and usual USB 4 port. I have just
heard from a friend VK4ZB, he has the same issue. He is using Win 7 also.
OK thanks for that, time to find the RS-232 breakout box I think :(
Allan
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-
Yes to both questions Bill. Win 7 and usual USB 4 port. I have just heard from
a friend VK4ZB, he has the same issue. He is using Win 7 also.
Allan
-Original Message-
From: "Bill Somerville"
Sent: 23/04/2015 9:16
To: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-
I know I'd be doing a lot more wspr if this were the case:-)
Josh Rovero
KK1D
--
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Pr
On 23/04/2015 00:06, Allan Downie wrote:
> Hi Gents,
Hi Allan,
>
> I appear to have a problem with this latest version regarding the PTT. I
> don't have any!
>
> I am not using CAT control. The transceiver uses a hard-wired PTT from
> the RTS pins to a real com port i.e. no USB adapters
> My PTT se
Hi Gents,
I appear to have a problem with this latest version regarding the PTT. I
don't have any!
I am not using CAT control. The transceiver uses a hard-wired PTT from
the RTS pins to a real com port i.e. no USB adapters
My PTT settings have worked on all previous versions (1.4, 1.5 and 1.6)
Hello Joe,
It would be quite nice to have WSPR integrated in WSJT-X. However, I think
we should try to preserve modularity as much as possible (high cohesion and
low coupling in Object Oriented Programming semantics). Separating the GUI
from the audio threads, rig control and the various decoders.
The real time waterfall is a big help when running a mode like WSPR-15 which
is still being used by the lowfer experimenters testing transatlantic
propagation. I welcome any development of consolidating the various programs
into one.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Origi
Hi Claude, Richard, Greg, and all,
KI7MT wrote:
> FWIW, I think this is a good Idea. I addition to the Hamlib updates, I
> would think the Qt Audio subsystem would also be of benefit.
>
> I like Python, but keeping the tool-chains and frameworks similar would
> surely be a plus and may even draw m
Hi Joe,
FWIW, I think this is a good Idea. I addition to the Hamlib updates, I
would think the Qt Audio subsystem would also be of benefit.
I like Python, but keeping the tool-chains and frameworks similar would
surely be a plus and may even draw more developers to the project(s).
There seems
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 2:17 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of wsprnet.org server processing times
Comments on this possible course of action would be welcome, from anyone!
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
I would love
On 04/22/2015 03:17 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
> Comments on this possible course of action would be welcome, from anyone!
I share your opinion and I find this a very good idea.
Best 88 de Claude (DJ0OT)
--
BPM Cam
Dear development Colleagues,
FYI, the message copied below has been sent to the "wsjtgroup" reflector.
-- Joe, K1JT
Original Message
Subject: [wsjtgroup] WSJT-X v1.5-rc1 (Release Candida
Hi John,
Many thanks for sharing your interesting results on processing time
returned by the wsprnet.org server!
Your recent work with WSPR-X has prodded me to think again about
possible future developments of WSPR. I'm presently leaning toward
exploring the possibility of including WSPR as a
22 matches
Mail list logo
