[wsjt-devel] WSJT suite

2015-05-04 Thread Pat D
Hi All, I have found a little problem in the WSJT-X v1..1-devel When I'm in TX and press the "Enable" button in WSJT-X, my TS-2000 stay in TX, but when I'm in TX and disabled the "Tx even" then my TS-2000 go in RX. Strange this is the only version I see this Using: Windows 7 Professional TRX: TS-

Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 proposed patch

2015-05-04 Thread Michael Black
Simple.most people send the extra 73..at least that's what I see >50% of the time. I've had people keep sending me a 73 waiting for a 73 in reply. I think the only reason RRR was in there in the first place was because nobody realized RR73 would be compressed.= and not take any more room.

Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 proposed patch

2015-05-04 Thread Neil Zampella
Frankly, I do not see how it saves 2 minutes.The based on the initial protocol, the RRR is the final acknowledgement of the QSO from the station calling CQ. The final 73 is the acknowledgement that the answering station received that ACK. It really saves nothing, it still takes three tra

[wsjt-devel] RR73 proposed patch

2015-05-04 Thread Michael Black
Coded up an option under the General tab for using RR73 instead of RRR. I've been seeing RR73 more and more and, IMHO it's a very clear sign off besides saving 2 minutes per QSO (noting that others have said RRR is an implied 73 so why not make it explicit rather than implicit). I was tempted

Re: [wsjt-devel] Some experiences with USB on an IC-9100 USB interface

2015-05-04 Thread Bill Somerville
On 04/05/2015 04:01, jeff millar wrote: Hi Jeff, * The 9100 has a Data Mode that can have a different Rx bandwidth from SSB mode o I set data mode to 3.6 KHz to see some of the JT9 band (without making SSB mode too wide) The widest IF filter on the IC-9100 is 3 kHz, you c