What I want is to run the modes that are currently only in WSJT.
I do not care much if they all get put into WSJT-X or an entirely new program.
While having one application that does everything has some appeal, I do realize
that often when one attempts to do everything with one application there
On Tue,5/26/2015 2:17 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> The venerable Python-based WSJT10 is nearing the end of nearly 15 years
> of development effort. In general, we are building new features and
> capabilities into WSJT-X,*not* WSJT. Back-porting features from the
> Qt-based WSJT-X to the Python3-based
Hi Jim P, Jim B, and all,
On Tue,5/26/2015 1:12 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
> WSJT Version 10.0 r5247:
>
> My $0.02 for future development; Use the same rig and sound card
setup that are used in WSJT-X.
On 5/26/2015 4:33 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> YES, PLEASE! I'm set up for SO2R contesting, and use th
On Tue,5/26/2015 1:12 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
> WSJT Version 10.0 r5247:
>
> My $0.02 for future development; Use the same rig and sound card setup that
> are used in WSJT-X.
YES, PLEASE! I'm set up for SO2R contesting, and use the "right" radio
for non-contest operation. Because WSJT only takes
WSJT-X V1.6.1-devel r5418:
Overall appears solid. Only issue found is occasionally on startup the JT9
start frequency is . This is old and been around since v1.4 at least.
No EME equipment so can't test JT4.
WSPR-X v0.9 r5276:
If there are errors in the rig setup, the program crashes and th
Hi Bill and all,
Next topic...
On 5/25/2015 6:12 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Joe, are you proposing that the JT4 and other VHF and up features are
> released along with the WSPR features? I am a little uncomfortable with
> that as it is a lot of new content for one release and I suspect that
> b
On 26/05/2015 16:21, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Bill,
Hi Joe,
>
> On 5/25/2015 6:12 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> we currently have the v1.5 branch of WSJT-X awaiting some documentation
>> updates before making a new release candidate, although unrelated it
>> would be nice to get that moving as well.
Hi Bill,
On 5/25/2015 6:12 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> we currently have the v1.5 branch of WSJT-X awaiting some documentation
> updates before making a new release candidate, although unrelated it
> would be nice to get that moving as well. The v1.5 branch has a few bug
> fixes since the RC1 rel
