[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.7.0 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial)

2015-11-26 Thread Greg Beam
Hello All, As I'm updating the dev-guide, I wanted to test the new combination of Asciidoctor ( for the user guide ) and AsciiDoc ( for manpages ), validate the package run-time dependencies and verify proper tarball construction using the wsjtx-superbuild script on Ubuntu 16.04. Long story sh

Re: [wsjt-devel] Linux Packaging - doc/CMakeLists.txt

2015-11-26 Thread KI7MT
Hi Barry, I wasn't aware you were looking for a script to build the source tarball. I made up a maintainer script some time back that allows me to build either the current RC branch or the Devel branch, both the tarball and application build. It's not real fancy, but gets the job done. The scrip

Re: [wsjt-devel] Linux Packaging - doc/CMakeLists.txt

2015-11-26 Thread KI7MT
Hi Barry, I wasn't aware you were looking for a script to build the source tarball. I made up a maintainer script some time back that allows me to build either the current RC branch or the Devel branch, both the tarball and application build. It's not real fancy, but gets the job done. The scrip

Re: [wsjt-devel] Many decodes

2015-11-26 Thread Allan Downie
... and that's using 1.6.0 or 1.7.0? I have been decoding a good number of -26/-27dB signals with the new decoder in 1.7.0 . Nice work Gents, many thanks. Allan VK4QG -Original Message- From: "Joe Taylor" Sent: ‎27/‎11/‎2015 0:26 To: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject

Re: [wsjt-devel] Linux Packaging - doc/CMakeLists.txt

2015-11-26 Thread Bill Somerville
On 27/11/2015 00:14, Barry Jackson wrote: > Thanks Bill, > I finally sorted it - but it's been a long night. > I think the INSTALL in wsjtx-superbuild dir could do with an update > as I could not make sense of it for making the tarball. > > I eventually experimented and wrote a little script to d

Re: [wsjt-devel] Linux Packaging - doc/CMakeLists.txt

2015-11-26 Thread Barry Jackson
On 26/11/15 12:47, Bill Somerville wrote: On 26/11/2015 12:28, Barry Jackson wrote: ... Regarding Hamlib, I would rather avoid any bundled software that is available in the distro (it's also policy). I have been testing wsjtx with our packaged hamlib and not had any problems that I am aware o

Re: [wsjt-devel] kvasd-installer package build patch

2015-11-26 Thread Barry Jackson
On 26/11/15 15:18, Greg Beam wrote: > Hi Barry, > > I'm surprised the the build server doesn't have ncurses as a default > package. > > In any case, v1.6.0 is the last series that requires the KVASD binary, > so kvasd-installer will no longer be be needed. Just my luck! > > I'll add this to the l

Re: [wsjt-devel] Many decodes

2015-11-26 Thread KI7MT
Nice one Joe, That beats my personal record of 27. The new decoder is doing a fantastic job. 73's Greg, KI7MT On 11/26/2015 07:32 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 26/11/2015 14:26, Joe Taylor wrote: >> On 15 meters this morning I decoded 30 >> stations in a single minute: 21 were JT65, 9 were JT

Re: [wsjt-devel] kvasd-installer package build patch

2015-11-26 Thread Greg Beam
Hi Barry, I'm surprised the the build server doesn't have ncurses as a default package. In any case, v1.6.0 is the last series that requires the KVASD binary, so kvasd-installer will no longer be be needed. I'll add this to the list for the next update, if there is one. 73's Greg, KI7MT On 1

[wsjt-devel] kvasd-installer package build patch

2015-11-26 Thread Barry Jackson
Hi, I have packaged kvasd-installer for Mageia, however both autogen .sh and Makefile.in both try to send 'clear' to a terminal, which it cannot do on our build system. This breaks the build. I have patched both files and the package now builds OK. Maybe you could include this in the source?

Re: [wsjt-devel] Many decodes

2015-11-26 Thread Bill Somerville
On 26/11/2015 14:26, Joe Taylor wrote: > On 15 meters this morning I decoded 30 > stations in a single minute: 21 were JT65, 9 were JT9. Enjoy it while the K index is zero before the SFI heads down the big slide towards the Solar minimum :( Happy Thanksgiving whatever that is. ... only joking. O

Re: [wsjt-devel] dt offset of 0.2s

2015-11-26 Thread Bill Somerville
On 26/11/2015 14:23, Steven Franke wrote: By the way, with reference to your speculation yesterday that we might have inserted a fudge factor to account for delays — at present there are*no* fudge factors inserted in the dt-estimation process that I am aware of. My statement was based on a fa

[wsjt-devel] Many decodes

2015-11-26 Thread Joe Taylor
Interesting new record (for me). On 15 meters this morning I decoded 30 stations in a single minute: 21 were JT65, 9 were JT9. Happy Thanksgiving to all Americans, today... and best wishes to all! -- Joe -- Go

Re: [wsjt-devel] dt offset of 0.2s

2015-11-26 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Steve, Thanks for finding and fixing the mysterious half-symbol offset! -- Joe On 11/26/2015 8:53 AM, Steven Franke wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Sleep is a wonderful thing. I found the problem right away this morning. The > first pulse generated by jt65sim (which is a sync pulse) *was* a run

Re: [wsjt-devel] dt offset of 0.2s

2015-11-26 Thread Steven Franke
Thanks Bill. I see that INT would have worked. By the way, with reference to your speculation yesterday that we might have inserted a fudge factor to account for delays — at present there are *no* fudge factors inserted in the dt-estimation process that I am aware of. I went on a crusade a whi

Re: [wsjt-devel] dt offset of 0.2s

2015-11-26 Thread Bill Somerville
On 26/11/2015 13:53, Steven Franke wrote: > I found the problem right away this morning. Hi Steve, D'oh! I stared at that line with the NINT(i/sps)+1 for ages knowing the problem had to be there somehow! Actually in this case INT(i/sps)+1 is probably all that is required as we are dealing with

Re: [wsjt-devel] dt offset of 0.2s

2015-11-26 Thread Steven Franke
Hi Joe, Sleep is a wonderful thing. I found the problem right away this morning. The first pulse generated by jt65sim (which is a sync pulse) *was* a runt. It was half as long as it should have been — essentially, the wave form was starting promptly at 1.0s into the file, but it was starting ha

Re: [wsjt-devel] Linux Packaging - doc/CMakeLists.txt

2015-11-26 Thread Bill Somerville
On 26/11/2015 12:28, Barry Jackson wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Barry, ... > This was just to test since I have been hitting some build issues with > the earlier versions which seem fixed in svn, however now I have found > this list I'm sure those can be resolved and I will continue with a > stable versio

Re: [wsjt-devel] Linux Packaging - doc/CMakeLists.txt

2015-11-26 Thread Barry Jackson
Hi Bill, Thanks for your quick reply. On 26/11/15 00:56, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 26/11/2015 00:19, Barry Jackson wrote: >> Hi, > Hi Barry, >> I am in the process of packaging wsjtx for Mageia (Linux) and hit a >> couple of issues test building the latest svn (r6180). > Good to know. I am surpr