Re: [wsjt-devel] three-pass JT65 decoding in WSJT-X

2016-01-29 Thread Игорь Ч
Hi Bill and All, >> r6449 makes 1071 decodes, in average 2.5 seconds per one file >> r6449mod_two-pass makes 1109 decodes, 4.8 seconds per one file >> r6449mod_three-pass makes 1152 decodes, 7.4 seconds per one file > > Hi Igor, > > these figures are interesting but you must include the number of

Re: [wsjt-devel] three-pass JT65 decoding in WSJT-X

2016-01-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/01/2016 15:16, Игорь Ч wrote: > r6449 makes 1071 decodes, in average 2.5 seconds per one file > r6449mod_two-pass makes 1109 decodes, 4.8 seconds per one file > r6449mod_three-pass makes 1152 decodes, 7.4 seconds per one file Hi Igor, these figures are interesting but you must include the nu

[wsjt-devel] three-pass JT65 decoding in WSJT-X

2016-01-29 Thread Игорь Ч
Hi Joe and All, Latest tests demonstrating high efficiency of the three-pass decoding on the overcrowded HF bands. The latest WSJT-X release was modified for tests with user choice between two- and three-pass decoding. Just some example for JT65+JT9 mode, Random erasure patterns=6, Agressive dec

Re: [wsjt-devel] Win 10 Preview 14251 Error

2016-01-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/01/2016 04:48, Michael Black wrote: > I guess when mine upgrades to 14256 I can debug the QT5.5 version if > it crashes here too. Hi Mike, that seems the best approach. Many Windows 10 Insider Preview users are suffering various issues with existing applications, generally they are seriou