Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X patches

On 11/09/2016 01:53, Dan Bates wrote: > I see the failures when a second client is polling the rigctld socket. > > The current code, in the failure routine just toggles a bool variable for a > single retry before throwing the error. Other apps (example fldigi) have a > user configurable variabl

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X patches

Hi Bill, I see the failures when a second client is polling the rigctld socket. The current code, in the failure routine just toggles a bool variable for a single retry before throwing the error. Other apps (example fldigi) have a user configurable variable for retry count. Dan. N5tm Sen

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X patches

On 10/09/2016 23:43, Dan Bates wrote: > One increases the number of retrys on rigctld as under certain > conditions I see the failure dialog when another retry would fix it. Hi Dan, I would be interested to know what those circumstances are? Also there is a n undocumented feature in WSJT-X to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X patches

Hi Mike, I have a couple of patches. One increases the number of retrys on rigctld as under certain conditions I see the failure dialog when another retry would fix it. I have also added QRA to the psk reporter. How should I share the code patches? Dan n5tm ARRL, QCAW, CW Ops First licens

Re: [wsjt-devel] Funny decode: LDE not ..... (r7034)

One reason as to why using a narrow pass-band is less relevant today than in past versions of WSJT-X is the addition of multi-pass decoding where the software itself eliminates ( subtracts out ) a large number of signals before a second pass is run on the same sample. Second pass decoding chang

Re: [wsjt-devel] Funny decode: LDE not ..... (r7034)

On 10-Sep-16 0833, Black Michael wrote: > But...looks like you have a 1.2kHz filter turned on. Your waterfall > shows it. You usually want the widest bandwidth you can do but at least > 2.2kHz for JT65. well, i guess i could be talked out of this practice. As I think I see it, I am on JT9 and f

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X patches

If anybody is running a "dirty" version of WSJT-X with your own patch how about letting us know what patch you're using and why?I'd like to think we can make everybody happyand maybe somebody has something useful the rest of us could benefit from... I'm running a patch the allow the logging

[wsjt-devel] [SPAM] Re: a couple of questions

Hey friend, I was writing an article and whanted to ask you a couple of questions, please answer them here Thanks for your consideration, info -- _

Re: [wsjt-devel] rc suggestion

I would just like to say that my feelings are the same as Joe's (below). I really HATE splash screens and cannot see the point of them. If a splash screen is provided, IMHO an option for disabling it *must* be provided. Mni tnx es 73 de Guy G4DWV/4X1LT PS Is http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.radi

Re: [wsjt-devel] Funny decode: LDE not ..... (r7034)

Not sure how you decoded yourself.. But...looks like you have a 1.2kHz filter turned on.  Your waterfall shows it.   You usually want the widest bandwidth you can do but at least 2.2kHz for JT65. de Mike W9MDB From: Bob KD7YZ To: WSJT-devel-List Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:45 AM S

Re: [wsjt-devel] Funny decode: LDE not ..... (r7034)

On 10/09/2016 10:45, Bob KD7YZ wrote: > was calling CQ JT9 on 40m. Thought I had a bite but discovered it was me > calling CQ, hi hi. Hi Bob, as you can see from the waterfall the WSJT-X receive was not disabled for your 0940 transmission, I assume you have your rig Tx monitor on but very low l