In that case it could be simplified to just the start of Tx 2 or 3. CQ/Tx 1
still not being even close in too many circumstances.
I'd like to see exactly what is being reported as inaccurate and what they are
claiming is the "correct" time since it is rather subjective.
The way I see it is on tx
"I don't see why it should not be that the start time is when the DX call
box gets changed and the end time is when the QSO is logged."
I frequently double click a call of interest so I can track the station in the
Rx frequency pane. It could be hours before I make the first transmission in
On 07/02/2017 02:05, Christian Wilson wrote:
On version 1.7 running on Windows 10 Pro I get the following error at
random times:
Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e
C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a C:\Users\OEM\AppData\Local\WSJT-X -t
C:\Users\OEM\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X
At line 5
On version 1.7 running on Windows 10 Pro I get the following error at
random times:
Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a
C:\Users\OEM\AppData\Local\WSJT-X -t C:\Users\OEM\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X
At line 54 of file C:\Users\bill\src\wsjt-svn\lib\decode
On 06/02/2017 23:36, Black Michael wrote:
At least in my theory the start time of two people in a QSO should be
the same.
So...
Tx 2 substract 2 time periods which should match the CQ time.
Tx 3 subtracts 3 time periods which should match the CQ time.
Hi Mike,
I think this is what is being re
Some examples of the inaccuracy with ALL.TXT log data to show what they should
be would help. People are contacting you directly instead of the mailing
list?Could this be off for fast mode protocols maybe?
The concept was this:
The Dx call box and Tx1 or Tx 6 does not indicate the start of a QSO
Hi All,
I am looking at the code for setting the start and end times of QSOs
because I've had reports of it not being as accurate as it should be. It
does seem a bit overcomplicated.
I don't see why it should not be that the start time is when the DX call
box gets changed and the end time is w
