Re: [wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8

2017-07-21 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
Hi Bill, I am wondering why FT8 does not support "CQ XXX" and "QSY 50.280" sequences which MSK144 supports concerning "split operation" topic discussed in this thread. I believe above two sequences intentionally bring the split operation to out-band, which is beneficial for DX-peditionners. D

Re: [wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8

2017-07-21 Thread Jim Brown
On 7/21/2017 3:09 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: firstly I should say that if everyone worked split on a busy band then the overall capacity would probably be reduced. There are good reasons for not calling zero beat. Taking 6M double-hop E-skip as an example, I often find myself beaten by a W0 s

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: How to handle using RR73 as a final

2017-07-21 Thread Neil Zampella
On 7/20/2017 8:39 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: There are plenty of us who DON'T use RR73 as it doesn't save any time on the slow modes whatsoever, and its an affectation that does not need to be formalized as part of the protocol (IMHO). There's a simple solution: if you don't like it, don't use

Re: [wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8

2017-07-21 Thread dgb
Very good idea Bill! tnx 73 Dwight NS9I On 7/21/2017 5:09 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 21/07/2017 10:49, R Edward wrote: In JT65/JT9, I often will try to find a clear transmit frequency, and by turning off TX/RX lock, work other stations split-frequency. In the hectic waterfall of FT8, tha

Re: [wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8

2017-07-21 Thread Steve Nance
I concur with Bob on a need for this feature and like your solution Bill. 73, Steve K5FR -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 5:10 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8 On 21/07/

Re: [wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8

2017-07-21 Thread Bill Somerville
On 21/07/2017 10:49, R Edward wrote: In JT65/JT9, I often will try to find a clear transmit frequency, and by turning off TX/RX lock, work other stations split-frequency. In the hectic waterfall of FT8, that is something I would especially like to do in this mode - I don't want to step on othe

Re: [wsjt-devel] adding a "skip TX1" checkbox

2017-07-21 Thread Bill Somerville
On 21/07/2017 06:41, Mark Turner via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Bill, could it be implemented it such that, if set, "Skip Tx 1" is simply ignored if the dx call is a compound callsign? In fact the whole Tx1/RR73 thing might be boiled down to a more generic option, like "minimal", or "optimise", or

[wsjt-devel] RX/TX lock in FT8

2017-07-21 Thread R Edward
In JT65/JT9, I often will try to find a clear transmit frequency, and by turning off TX/RX lock, work other stations split-frequency. In the hectic waterfall of FT8, that is something I would especially like to do in this mode - I don't want to step on other callers to a CQ'ing station, and wou

[wsjt-devel] FT8 - Removal of dupes

2017-07-21 Thread Adrian Fabry
I saw that Steve made a change in r7931: "*Only print dupes if SNR is higher than what has already been printed."* IMO dupes are useful in some cases: 1.is interesting to get 2 or 3 decodes of the same call doppler shifted by airplane reflection 2. some stations have side bands, it's good to deco