> On Sep 12, 2017, at 7:48 PM, Steven Franke wrote:
>
> Further, it is surely reasonable that one side of a prearranged sked might
> want to populate the DX Call box and then call CQ. As you know, skeds
> sometimes proceed this way - two stations meet on a frequency with a prior
> understand
Thanks Steve. ..most interesting.
While it is true that the prior state is retained, let's look at the
probability of the two paths being desired.
1. Is Gen std msgs really used to call cq, or is one more likely to simply
choose tx6, which is CQ, and hit enable Transmit. In all my use of the
soft
Hi Hasan,
The behavior that I observe is: populate the DX Call box, click Generate Std
Msgs box, and the TX1 thru TX6 boxes are populated. The Tx state remains
wherever it was when this sequence of steps was initiated. If I Generate Std
Msgs with the Tx1 box checked, then the Tx1 box remains ch
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Hasan al-Basri wrote:
>
> I meet a station on Ping Jockey and we agree to begin a qso. I enter his
> call in the blank DX Call box , K1SIX. I click the Generate Std Msgs box, and
> the TX1 thru TX6 populate.
This bit me yesterday also, Hasan. Generate should a
I have played with this quite a bit and cannot figure out the reason for
the following:
I meet a station on Ping Jockey and we agree to begin a qso. I enter his
call in the blank DX Call box , K1SIX. I click the Generate Std Msgs box,
and the TX1 thru TX6 populate.
But...the TX defaults to TX6..
On 11/09/2017 02:28, Michael Tharp wrote:
On 09/10/2017 08:39 PM, David Tiller wrote:
Since WSJT-X uses UDP, there is a chance that you can get more than 1
listener to receive all UDP packets. According to this article, if
all clients bind to the port using SO_REUSEPORT (and possibly
SO_REUSEA
On 11/09/2017 13:51, Richard Shaw wrote:
--style fusion did fix it. I also tried --style native which gave the
same large +/- buttons but the color scheme was different. I have not
intentionally cusomized anything so I'm not sure what's causing it. Is
there a way to force the style or do I need
On 11/09/2017 18:23, Wolfgang wrote:
I like the --style=fusion - are there any others ?
Hi Wolfgang,
the fusion style is part of the Qt framework that we use to implement
WSJT-X. Normally Qt tries to use a native style for its graphical
elements, these are usually much more efficient and co
Hi all,
may I ask again - I am using --style=fusion , I like that ;-)
Tried to find that in the source. Are there any other command line
options, besides --rig-name and in wich part of the code are they ?
73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW
--
Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charg
On 12/09/2017 17:51, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
Is there any limit on the number of configurations that can be stored?
Hi Charlie,
not really but managing the list on screen will become unwieldy after a
hundred or so.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
---
On 12/09/2017 17:00, Mark Killmon - K4SO wrote:
To limit the size of the program on-screen, could the extra space
before the displayed countries be trimmed back?
I believe the space was smaller in the past (perhaps distant past).
This is more of an issue when the decoded font is larger than
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 10:51 AM, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>
> Is there any limit on the number of configurations that can be stored?
I don’t know the answer to that, but I’ve had as many as 15 with no problem.
I’m down to a dozen now. Once I learned to use Configurations
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:53 AM, Scott Bidstrup wrote:
>
> But this problem should be noted if it leads to some other issue, elsewhere,
> or maybe make a note of it in the user guide so that others don't embarrass
> themselves as I just have.
When I build a new version, I preset the old one to
Hi All
I have tried removing the ! in the third line below, and this restores Echo
Graph and seems to behave as expected.
Problem with Echo graph not updating remains.
if(i==21) ui->actionInclude_correlation->setVisible (b);
if(i==22) {
if(b && !m_echoGraph->isVisible()) {
m_echoGr
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> Just figured out...if you turn off the controls it shrinks a lot further.
I did that with control turned on, if I remember correctly. I’ll check when I
get back in a couple of hours.
Gary - AG0N
---
Hi Bill
Is there any limit on the number of configurations that can be stored?
73
Charlie
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_
To limit the size of the program on-screen, could the extra space before
the displayed countries be trimmed back?
I believe the space was smaller in the past (perhaps distant past). This
is more of an issue when the decoded font is larger than default
(helpful for mobile devices, and the aging
On 12/09/2017 08:37 a.m., Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Just figured out...if you turn off the controls it shrinks a lot further.
I just discovered an issue with that. If you have it shrunk down, then
turn on the controls, it will resize to accommodate the controls - but
then, when you
On 12/09/2017 08:37 a.m., Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Just figured out...if you turn off the controls it shrinks a lot further.
de Mike W9MDB
Ah, that should be noted in the user guide. I think that's what tripped
me up. Thanks, Mike.
Scott TI3/W7RI
--
On 12/09/2017 08:11 a.m., Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
There's no such thing as "configured bandwidth". WSJT-X has no idea
what the width on your rig is.
How much smaller than this do you need the window to be? See the window
on the upper left here? It's about half the width of the min
Just figured out...if you turn off the controls it shrinks a lot further.
de Mike W9MDB
From: Gary McDuffie
To: WSJT software development
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request - Wide Graph Size
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Scott Bi
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Scott Bidstrup wrote:
>
> Would it not be possible to set the minimum window width on the wide graph
> window to the number of pixels required to display the configured bandwidth
> at the current bins per pixel setting? This would provide a cleaner solution
> t
Folks,
I have a small feature request.
I have an issue with the wide-graph window size. Seems that I cannot
reduce the size to allow it to fit on the screen the way I would like
anymore. It was not an issue in RC1, but it is in the current release.
My computer monitor is of rather limited
23 matches
Mail list logo
