Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Type 2 prefix validation

2017-10-03 Thread Claude Frantz
On 10/03/2017 11:04 PM, Alex, VE3NEA wrote: Hi Alex & all, Usually, when I have to test the validity of a callsign, I use the perl regular expression: ^((([A-PR-Z]+[0-9]*[A-Z]?)|([1-9][A-Z]+[0-9]*))\/)?(([A-PR-Z]+[0-9]+[A-Z]+)|([1-9][A-Z]+[0-9]+[A-Z]+))(\/([PMA0-9]|MM|(([A-Z]+[0-9]*[A-Z]?)|([1-9

[wsjt-devel] Fwd: Type 2 prefix validation

2017-10-03 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
WSJTx could suppress invalid messages like this: 203500 -19 0.1 513 ~ CQ 02E4/XX4IWT JO12 !where? by performing a simple validation of type 2 prefixes. A valid prefix has one of these patterns: @ @@ @@# @@#@ @# @#@ @## #@ #@@ #@# #@@# where @ is any letter and # is any digit, and the first

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Dev observation.

2017-10-03 Thread DXer
Another observation. Scenario: I'm following a QSO between 2 other stations. Before the station I'm interested in contacting sends his/her final 73, I set everything up for a tail ending call. However, when the 73 message is received, Tx is disabled, and I have to click enable Tx again, possibly

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Dev observation.

2017-10-03 Thread Gary McDuffie
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 6:18 AM, DXer wrote: > > The following situation occurs when Call 1st is selected. While I did use Call 1st when it was first introduced, as soon as the mode became popular I unchecked that box and never went back. I get 3-4, sometimes more replies if I CQ. Directional

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Dev observation.

2017-10-03 Thread DXer
The following situation occurs when Call 1st is selected. I call CQ, two stations answer, Call 1st 'engages' with one of the stations, but I want the other one. The only way I found to override the Call 1st choice is to stop Tx, click on the station I want , and start Tx again. The time required t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Experimental changes in r8146

2017-10-03 Thread Richard Lamont
On 02/10/17 01:15, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi David, > >> The real issue is the TX Enable.  I’d like to avoid having it set on >> the double click so I can pick the right time in the other QSO to send >> my message, on a split frequency. > > Why not simply uncheck the box "Double-click on call sets T