I know that a1 is for CQ apriorir. Maybe I'm confused on what it really means
then.The docs says "Successful AP decodes are labeled" which, to me, means it
has to know the information BEFORE the decode happens. How can you "apriori"
decode something you haven't seen before?I thought AP decodin
Hi Mike
Its the CQ.
See User Guide sect 12.1. Table 1 refers to FT8.
73
Charlie
> How did CQ W9HT EN71 get tagged a1? It was the 1st time seeing him after
> the 73 at 044600.There was no apriori information that I can see
> here1.9.0-rc2 r8543
>
>
>
>
> de Mike W9MDB
> --
How did CQ W9HT EN71 get tagged a1? It was the 1st time seeing him after the
73 at 044600.There was no apriori information that I can see here1.9.0-rc2
r8543
de Mike W9MDB
--
Check out the vibrant tech community
Bill,
Thanks for the tips!
Ted
K9IMM
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 6:10 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] VSPE issue
On 08/03/2018 15:56, Ted Gisske wrote:
Has anyone had success using a VSPE splitter
Ted, here's what I do to use N1MM Logger+ with wsjt-x:
I created a second, different shortcut to the N1MM Logger+ program that
starts N1MM Logger+ with a different .ini file, one that does NOT talk to
the radio. N1MM is really only used for logging, and the frequency and mode
information is provid
On 08/03/2018 15:56, Ted Gisske wrote:
Has anyone had success using a VSPE splitter to direct both N1MM+ and
WSJT-X to the same rig-control port (in my case a TS-990 on COM4). If
so, I’d appreciate knowing how you got it done. The splitter seems to
work OK with N1MM, but WSJT-X refuses to con
Small patch to allow finding a3, a4, etc in the docs
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bj043z9bfq6vvld/decoder_notes.patch?dl=
de Mike W9MDB
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,
Apologies if this is not the correct place to ask...
I've searched Google but can't find a solution.
Using WSJT-X v1.8.0 r8193 and an AOR AR3030 receiver.
In File/Settings/Radio I select AOR AR3030, Baude rate 4800, 8 data
bits, 2 stop bits, no handshake.
I press "4800 ENT" on the receiver an
I am using 1.9-RC2. What I am trying to do is run N1MM+ and WSJT-X
simultaneously to control the radio without having to reconfigure one or the
other program to avoid CAT port conflicts. It gets to be pretty clumsy to
switch programs, or have N1MM+ open to get UDP broadcasts.
I see from some
Are you using version 1.9.0-RC2, as it interfaces directly with N1MM.
On 3/8/2018 10:56 AM, Ted Gisske wrote:
Has anyone had success using a VSPE splitter to direct both N1MM+ and
WSJT-X to the same rig-control port (in my case a TS-990 on COM4). If
so, I’d appreciate knowing how you got it
Can you explain better what you are trying to do?
If you want to know the UDP command used by WSJT-X it's documented in the
source code file NetworkMessage.hpp
de Mike W9MDB
On Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 8:00:27 PM CST, José Aparecido Pereira
wrote:
Hello friendsI am developing an
Ted I tried the one by Eltima, Fabulatech and the free splitter one and could
not get them to work with WSJT-X. It worked with MixW and my
logging program but not WSJT-X.
Jerry W8DLD
From: Ted Gisske
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 10:56 AM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel]
I upgrade my Ubuntu 17.10 to gcc 8.0.1 2018030 and the memory leak has now
disappeared compiling with 8.0.1. gcc 7.3 still leaked.
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 5:08:02 PM CST, Doug Collinge
wrote:
Ok, done. The only difference is that the deb is linked with libgfortran
Has anyone had success using a VSPE splitter to direct both N1MM+ and WSJT-X to
the same rig-control port (in my case a TS-990 on COM4). If so, I’d appreciate
knowing how you got it done. The splitter seems to work OK with N1MM, but
WSJT-X refuses to connect.
Thanks!
Ted
K9IMM
--
Hello Phil,
.
>Igor, the whole point of playing out silence is to maintain
>synchronization. If, for example, the sampling rate is 48 kHz and your
>RTP packets each contain 240 samples (5 milliseconds), then I would
>replace a single missing packet with 240 samples of binary zeroes. Your
>signal bl
Now here's a case for the the new DXpedition mode in WSJT-X; Stunning
pileup on 30m ... wonder what the other South China Sea listeners make of
this on their OTHR :)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the wor
16 matches
Mail list logo
