On 27/10/2018 2:40 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Would really like to see Fox messages passed through to JTAlert.
Then one can use JTAlert's audio alerts and email features to hear DX
alerts.
Plus spotting the Fox would seem a good idea so that propagation paths
could be seen on PS
Would really like to see Fox messages passed through to JTAlert.Then one can
use JTAlert's audio alerts and email features to hear DX alerts.Plus spotting
the Fox would seem a good idea so that propagation paths could be seen on
PSKReported and such.
de Mike W9MDB
_
While running JT65B
Selecting:
"View"
"Message averaging"
Results in the:
"WSJT-X Contest Log"
Dialog box being displayed
Running on a Windows 7 PC
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourc
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:21 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
>
> What is the method to verify my system is indeed enjoying the 1 dB SNR
> improvement that 2.0 gives?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jim
>
> WA2ZKD
Hi Jim,
You might try turning on “Save All” and running for, say, 24 hours or even a
couple of days. Then yo
What is the method to verify my system is indeed enjoying the 1 dB SNR
improvement that 2.0 gives?
Thanks
Jim
WA2ZKD
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
John,
You’re right, RC3 has only been out since around the 16th, when I installed it,
but I’ve been on FT8 only for months. For the week or so I’ve used it I hadn’t
had the error until yesterday.
WA1OUI
On Oct 26, 2018, at 11:01 AM, John wrote:
David,
> that’s the only mode I’ve used on WSJ
Adam,
When I say "top posting" I mean that I'm replying over your latest
message (on top of the msg).
I asked this because in other ML the rule wants that user shall to
respond using "bottom posting" or better under the message sent by the
OP to whom we are responding to.
I will send my latest un
Hi Marco,
Not sure what you mean by "top posting" replies but hopefully this is
readable for you.
I don't think there is that much of a connection between asciidoc and
hamlib, I searched in Google "does hamlib use asciidoc" and all the
results that appeared were people having build issues with old
David,
> that’s the only mode I’ve used on WSJT-X for months!
The FT8 error only arrived with rc3 - which has not been available “for
months”. I suspect that you changed from rc2 to rc3.
— John G4KLA
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
But that’s the only mode I’ve used on WSJT-X for months! Hasn’t happened until
yesterday.
David, WA1OUI
On Oct 26, 2018, at 4:37 AM, John wrote:
David,
> My question is why would it just show itself today? Any idea what I might
> have done differently that I haven’t done before?
This error
David,
> My question is why would it just show itself today? Any idea what I might
> have done differently that I haven’t done before?
This error only occurs when you use FT8 mode.
— John G4KLA
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
