Re: [wsjt-devel] WW Digi Contest Practices

2019-08-08 Thread Iztok Saje
Hi Alan, No, WW_digi contest 2019 is FT4+FT8 only. https://ww-digi.com/ 73, S52d Hi Tom and Iztok, Does the contest include JS8CALL AND Codec2 digital voice? Alan VK2ZIW On 08/08/2019 09:59 AM, Iztok Saje wrote: Hi Tom! Check for latest N1MM+. on WSJTX 2.1: select NA VHF contest. 73 gl,

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of mode MFSK

2019-08-08 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi Derek, comments in line below. On 08/08/2019 22:01, Derek Turner via wsjt-devel wrote: In connection with this and slightly off-topic I have some questions for the development team. In the .log file the FT4 mode is expressed simply as 'FT4' but in the .adi file it is 'MFSK FT4 '. The ADIF

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rx Frequency window

2019-08-08 Thread Bill Somerville
On 08/08/2019 20:42, Derek Turner via wsjt-devel wrote: As the developer of a helper application for the WSJT client I have found that message type thirteen 'Highlight Callsign' is extremely beneficial as it enables me to locate callsigns that I find interesting in the Band Activity window very

Re: [wsjt-devel] WW Digi Contest Practices

2019-08-08 Thread Alan VK2ZIW
Hi Tom and Iztok, Does the contest include JS8CALL AND Codec2 digital voice? Alan VK2ZIW On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:59:01 +0200, Iztok Saje wrote > Hi Tom! > > Check for latest N1MM+. > > on WSJTX 2.1: select NA VHF contest. > > 73 gl, cu > Iztok, s52d > > -- > > > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Suggestion

2019-08-08 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Serge, On 8/8/2019 17:31, Serge F6BHK wrote: at the dawn of WSJT-X we had the choice to decode JT65+JT9 under the same combo value. I remember I found it very useful. When I double-clicked a JT65 signal then I was sending using JT65, same for JT9. would'nt it be nice to have a FT8+FT4 comb

[wsjt-devel] Suggestion

2019-08-08 Thread F6BHK
Hi all! at the dawn of WSJT-X we had the choice to decode JT65+JT9 under the same combo value. I remember I found it very useful. When I double-clicked a JT65 signal then I was sending using JT65, same for JT9. would'nt it be nice to have a FT8+FT4 combo value that decode both of the protoco

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of mode MFSK

2019-08-08 Thread Derek Turner via wsjt-devel
In connection with this and slightly off-topic I have some questions for the development team. In the .log file the FT4 mode is expressed simply as 'FT4' but in the .adi file it is 'MFSK FT4 '. So one's log is in two places and it is easy to view and modify the .log file in MS Excel but this i

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of mode MFSK

2019-08-08 Thread Frans de Bles
Developers tnx for the info. We have to deal with it. 73 Frans PC2F Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung Galaxy-smartphone. Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: August Treubig Datum: 08-08-19 19:54 (GMT+01:00) Aan: WSJT software development Onderwerp: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rx Frequency window

2019-08-08 Thread Derek Turner via wsjt-devel
As the developer of a helper application for the WSJT client I have found that message type thirteen 'Highlight Callsign' is extremely beneficial as it enables me to locate callsigns that I find interesting in the Band Activity window very easily, especially when the band is busy and the window

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hound mode stops decodes?

2019-08-08 Thread Bill Frantz
On 8/6/19 at 5:14 AM, g4...@classdesign.com (Bill Somerville) wrote: correct and it has always been unchecked by default. There is no advantage to decoding other hound stations when they are not in QSO with the Fox. I use "Decode all" for two reasons: To check that my clock is correct. When

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rx Frequency window

2019-08-08 Thread Jon Anhold
Might I suggest an alternate setting or option: Highlight stations that are calling this station but not currently in the "DX Call" field in a different, perhaps lighter, color of red. That way you still see them, but it is more obvious which one you are currently in QSO with. 73 de KM8V On Sun,

Re: [wsjt-devel] 60 Hz + harmonics sidebands on FT8 signals? (Paul Kube)

2019-08-08 Thread Jim Brown
The concept of a so-called "ground loop" is completely false. It has no basis in physics. The "buzz" we hear when equipment is not properly bonded consists of triplen harmonics of the mains frequency, 50 or 60 Hz, depending on where you live. What DOES couple this trash is the failure to follow

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of mode MFSK

2019-08-08 Thread August Treubig
It is correct. The AIDF gods have decreed. Sorry. See a number of discussions here. FT4 is a submode, Aug AG5AT Sent from my iPad > On Aug 8, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Frans de Bles wrote: > > Dear developers, > > I-am greatfull for you all making WSJT-X 2.1 with FT4 integrated! > I have one qu

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 up and running--Tks!

2019-08-08 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
And what was the solution? de Mike W9MDB On Thursday, August 8, 2019, 12:29:57 PM CDT, Jan C. Robbins wrote: FT8 up and running with FTDX-101MP.  Tks to all who responded! 73 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net h

[wsjt-devel] FT8 up and running--Tks!

2019-08-08 Thread Jan C. Robbins
FT8 up and running with FTDX-101MP.  Tks to all who responded! 73 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of mode MFSK

2019-08-08 Thread Bill Somerville
On 08/08/2019 18:07, Frans de Bles wrote: Dear developers, I-am greatfull for you all making WSJT-X 2.1 with FT4 integrated! I have one question/point of comment: FT4 is the WSJT adif log file is set on submode FT4. When i upload to my logbook this adif files the mode is set MFSK and submode

[wsjt-devel] FT4 is a submode of mode MFSK

2019-08-08 Thread Frans de Bles
Dear developers, I-am greatfull for you all making WSJT-X 2.1 with FT4 integrated! I have one question/point of comment: FT4 is the WSJT adif log file is set on submode FT4. When i upload to my logbook this adif files the mode is set MFSK and submode FT4. I think hope that it must be the same

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 with FTDX-101D/MP

2019-08-08 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Give the FT-991 entry a try and see how it does.  It's got the same IF command response so might work.Looks like we'll have to add it. de Mike W9MDB On Thursday, August 8, 2019, 09:54:29 AM CDT, Jan C. Robbins wrote: Is there any way to use current WSJT-X (2.0.1) with the new FTD

[wsjt-devel] FT8 with FTDX-101D/MP

2019-08-08 Thread Jan C. Robbins
Is there any way to use current WSJT-X (2.0.1) with the new FTDX-101D/MP?  Any info much appreciated!  Tks es 73. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] WW Digi Contest Practices

2019-08-08 Thread Iztok Saje
Hi Tom! Check for latest N1MM+. on WSJTX 2.1: select NA VHF contest. 73 gl, cu Iztok, s52d -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:58:37 +0300 From: Tom Ramberg To: rttydigi...@groups.io Cc: cq-cont...@contesting.com, WSJT software development Subject: Re:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hound mode stops decodes?

2019-08-08 Thread Claude Frantz
On 8/7/19 11:51 PM, Bill Richter wrote: I'd beg to differ, since I've seen lag times of 20-30 minutes there and that can mean a a difference of a band being open or closed. You are right, Bill, but such lags are pathologic ones. There is something not working well. When I want to look for the

Re: [wsjt-devel] [RttyDigital] WW Digi Contest Practices

2019-08-08 Thread Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel
Which logger can I use for this contest? I far as I can see, N1MM+does not support it. If running only with WSJT-X 2.1.0, which options should I choose on the "Special operating activity" tab? Tom OH6VDA > 2. aug. 2019 kl. 20:16 skrev Ed Muns, W0YK : > > Two one-hour practices each week leadi