+ AA6YQ comments below
Dave,
Sorry I have to step in here.
> Seriously, I do think Ham Radio software does need to adopt some modern
> architecture principles.
ABSOLUTE GARBAGE in my opinion ... that attitude puts Amateur Radio and its
people back into the stone age
+ That's not my po
"a pair of equal and oppositely charged or magnetized poles separated by
a distance."
Is the 'equal' referring to the amount of 'charge' applied to both poles
rather than length ? It certainly could be interpreted that way, rather
than assume 'equal' length of the 'poles'.
In that context Th
+ AA6YQ comments below
On the first point, we more or less agree. A development team can focus on many
things, true. The point Im trying to make here is
that logging and weak-signal processing are two very different functions, and
don't belong in the same application. If an exception
is to be ma
> Perhaps this is a subject better for a QRZ forum?
I agree. I drifted off list topic. Im going to stop answering, and will move to
QRZ.
I absolutely agree with Steve's comments on the quality of WSJT-X and Hamlib,
and associate myself with his comments.
See you on QRZ.
Thanks. Robert. AD6I.
Dave,
Sorry I have to step in here.
> Seriously, I do think Ham Radio software does need to adopt some modern
> architecture principles.
ABSOLUTE GARBAGE in my opinion ... that attitude puts Amateur Radio and its
people back into the stone age
You move away from standards you get uncon
Dave:
On the first point, we more or less agree. A development team can focus on many
things, true. The point Im trying to make here is that logging and weak-signal
processing are two very different functions, and don't belong in the same
application. If an exception is to be made here, yes, it
+ AA6YQ comments below
Seriously, I do think Ham Radio software does need to adopt some modern
architecture principles. In this context the WSJT-X team
should be focused on weak-signal communication protocol processing. Issues such
as logging should be left to others to focus on, and
there shoul
I ran FD with N3FJP (the FD version) and N3FJP logged just fine from JTalert
(you enable ACLog in JTalert) - and never got the duplicate logs that went into
WSJTx’s contest log because I did not recognize the caller fast enough and was
using auto-log. Both N3FJP and JTalert were on the same mach
My apologies to all for my reply coming with some extra snark.
Seriously, I do think Ham Radio software does need to adopt some modern
architecture principles. In this context the WSJT-X team should be focused on
weak-signal communication protocol processing. Issues such as logging should be
l
Terry,
Matters around TCP spotting has been raised a number of times (and I note a
subsequent response from Robert AD6I).
Terry - as Bill raises - JTAlert is by FAR the most advanced tool that has the
"potential" ... yet at the moment lacks "capability".
[ Laurie VK3AMA also runs his own "sp
IMHO, this sort of thing is often better implemented as a program emulating the
client's supported protocol. That program can then communicate with whatever
downstream service is needed, in its preferred protocol.
Even better is to apply some well defined modern application solution instead,
li
On 30/06/2020 01:53, Terry Estes wrote:
Many other amateur radio stations use the N3FJP Logging Software,
primarily for logging ARRL Field Day and Winter Field Day contests.
The addition of Field Day exchange capabilities to WSJT-X has made the
use during FD of FT-8 a major improvement and has i
Many other amateur radio stations use the N3FJP Logging Software, primarily
for logging ARRL Field Day and Winter Field Day contests.
The addition of Field Day exchange capabilities to WSJT-X has made the use
during FD of FT-8 a major improvement and has increased its use for FD.
Many stations now
Hi Reino,
I am trying it. Until now it seems to work thanks !
73 Roland, DK4RH
Von: Reino Talarmo
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Juni 2020 19:26
An: 'WSJT software development'
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Double Click, sometimes wrong CallSign
Hi Roland,
You could try use General >
> On Jun 29, 2020, at 11:25, Reino Talarmo wrote:
>
> Sometimes I try to answer a CQ with a double click in the Band Activity Part
> - but not the station is used, which I had selected.
More than likely, you are a victim of the multiple decoding cycles per 15
second sequence. The screen up
Separate box (or status bar entry) that just displays the highest row number?
Alan G0TLK
On 29 June 2020 19:21:45 Bill Somerville wrote:
On 29/06/2020 19:12, Gerald Smith wrote:
Good Afternoon,
After working Field Day this weekend, and operating on the FT4 - FT8
station, I noticed that in th
On 29/06/2020 19:12, Gerald Smith wrote:
Good Afternoon,
After working Field Day this weekend, and operating on the FT4 - FT8
station, I noticed that in the Contest Log the QSOs are numbered in
the left hand column, numbers ascending from the top of the log to the
bottom.
By the same token,
Good Afternoon,
After working Field Day this weekend, and operating on the FT4 - FT8
station, I noticed that in the Contest Log the QSOs are numbered in the
left hand column, numbers ascending from the top of the log to the bottom.
By the same token, each new QSO is added to the top of the li
Hi Roland,
You could try use General > Display Start new period decodes at top. At
least I got help.
73, Reino OH3mA
From: roland.hartm...@web.de [mailto:roland.hartm...@web.de]
Sent: 29. kesäkuuta 2020 19:24
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Double Click, sometimes
Think a smaller issue, but also happened on other stations:
Sometimes I try to answer a CQ with a double click in the Band Activity Part
- but not the station is used, which I had selected.
Example:
I did a double click on IU8MOA - but N9FN was used.
It is almost happened, if somethin
On 29/06/2020 03:47, Jim Brown wrote:
There are times when it could be quite helpful to be able to switch
special operating features on and off from the main operating window.
One of those times occurred this weekend, when I wanted to be able to
switch between FD messages to work FD stations an
Hi Matt,
you can log these callers or ignore them, to log them you will have to
guess their FD section which may be possible with a bit of help from
QRZ.COM. You can bet 1D is their FD class. If they are DX there's no
issue, just use "1D DX", I suppose you could use "1D DX" for all of them
an
22 matches
Mail list logo
