Well Gary, in the case of the USA the stateside "locals" are happily working
each other over and over again on HF, with relatively few trying to work DX.
I can't comment on six since I don't have a presence there.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:12:07 -0600
Gary McDuffie wrote:
> > On
> On Jul 9, 2021, at 19:11, Jim Shorney wrote:
>
> I would like to see a defined DX window also. Despite the WSJT-X magic
> ability to separate signals the DX is often buried under the "locals”.
I suppose the “locals” aren’t working DX? JA and EU both prefer to be 1st, so
I would assume mos
Tnx Mike -- I will fix this flaw.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 7/10/2021 11:38 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Somebody noted that EA3A came up with grid JN12.
The logic in void MainWindow::lookup() doesn't look for any exact match.
It finds the first call that matches EA3A which is this
Somebody noted that EA3A came up with grid JN12.
The logic in void MainWindow::lookup() doesn't look for any exact match.
It finds the first call that matches EA3A which is this oneEA3ACD,JN12,,,
This lineif(t.indexOf(hisCall)==0) {
Should beif(t.indexOf(hisCall+",")==0) {
Mike W9MDB
___
On 7/9/21 7:59 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe and all,
But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple sub-bands
on a given HF band) are really what is required to relieve congestion.
The current bandplans are often unrealistic. The CW only part is often
by far too large. See the 2200 m ban
