FWIW ... others are running the Windows 11 beta without problems.
Trying to compare HRD and FLDIGI to WSJT-X decoding is apples and oranges.
WSJT-X is VERY CPU dependent, it needs a very fast CPU. What CPU are
you using to run it on? The fact that decoding is having a problem
usually points
William,
Change? No.
Be more accurately measured? Yes.
But enough to change EME calculations in WSJT-X? No idea, that is why
I asked the question.
"Compared to the previous general-purpose ephemerides DE430, seven
years of new data have been added to compute DE440 and DE441,
Il 18/08/21 07:21, Luigi Casari via wsjt-devel ha scritto:
Non mi interessa, stop !
Il giorno 18 ago 2021, alle ore 09:27, halsteaw--- via wsjt-devel
ha scritto:
(Not an astronomer)
I noticed in the contrib/Ephemeris folder that the JPLEPH file is
DE405 which was created back in 1997.
(Ref:
I can't easily determine how the accuracy of the two files differs, but does
the moon change it's orbital parameters that much in 23 years?
73, Willie N1JBJ
> On Aug 18, 2021, at 3:27 AM, halsteaw--- via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> (Not an astronomer)
>
> I noticed in the contrib/Ephemeris fold
Luigi,
I'm sorry you are not interested, but it is a valid question about the
WSJT-X code.
Warren
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021, 3:41 AM Luigi Casari via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Non mi interessa, stop !
>
> > Il giorno 18 ago 2021, alle ore 09:27, halsteaw--- via wsj
New member!
I am running the new Windows 11 beta on my desktop. I found the WSJT-X does
not work properly. It appears the decoding is having a problem. Both Ham
Radio Deluxe and FLDIGI software works fine. You may need to check it out.
Maybe the issue will be resolved when the full vers
Non mi interessa, stop !
> Il giorno 18 ago 2021, alle ore 09:27, halsteaw--- via wsjt-devel
> ha scritto:
>
> (Not an astronomer)
>
> I noticed in the contrib/Ephemeris folder that the JPLEPH file is
> DE405 which was created back in 1997.
> (Ref: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_eph_export )
On 8/14/21 06:55, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Mike,
it is not cleared automatically. TBH it's not a big deal as hash
collisions that cause incorrect decodes are rare since the vast
majority of WSPR transmissions are Type 1 messages. We normally
suggest deleting it if someone re
(Not an astronomer)
I noticed in the contrib/Ephemeris folder that the JPLEPH file is
DE405 which was created back in 1997.
(Ref: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_eph_export )
Is there a reason that such old data is being used?
For the best EME and other calculations, shouldn't DE440 which was
c
