Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib testing

2022-06-02 Thread Al Pawlowski via wsjt-devel
Too bad WSJTx does not have even more tx adjustment steps, say related to whatever the needed tx BW of the mode is - maybe 100HZ for FT8. Then, operators with standard style adjustable tx BW in their rigs could limit their tx to just a bit more than the tx adjustment step to make a maximally-tig

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib testing

2022-06-02 Thread 5p1kzx Michael via wsjt-devel
Hi Everyone I have tested new the Hamlib with WSJT-X and JTDX in RIG and Fake It. I tested it with IC-7300, IC-7000 and IC-706Mk2g - behaviour as expected and no problems so far. 73 de Michael 5p1kzx Den 31-05-2022 kl. 18:04 skrev Black Michael via wsjt-devel: I need everyone to test the la

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib testing

2022-06-02 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
You mean the Doppler tracking in the Astronomical window doesn't work? Mike W9MDB On Thursday, June 2, 2022, 07:24:04 AM CDT, Don Hawbaker wrote: On the 2.3 GHz EME band, we have to operate cross band.  US transmits on 2304.1 while Europe transmits on 2320.1.  Like wise, US recei

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib testing

2022-06-02 Thread Don Hawbaker via wsjt-devel
On the 2.3 GHz EME band, we have to operate cross band. US transmits on 2304.1 while Europe transmits on 2320.1. Like wise, US receives on 2320.1 and Europe receives on 2304.1. That is a 16 MHz split. I use A B VFO and a transceiver that can receive 160.1 and transmit 144.1. But I cannot se