Re: [wsjt-devel] possible bug in gen_ft8wave

2023-05-28 Thread Paulh002 via wsjt-devel
Hello Steve, I downloaded the code recently. It is a bit strange that it was an old version, anyway I checked-out the code again and now see the change made. I will update my library. Thanks! 73 Paul PA0PHH Op zo 28 mei 2023 om 14:42 schreef Steven Franke : > Hi, > > In the old version of gen_f

Re: [wsjt-devel] possible bug in gen_ft8wave

2023-05-28 Thread Steven Franke via wsjt-devel
Hi, In the old version of gen_ft8wave that you have based your library on there was was no bug because gen_ft8wave was always called with fsample=48000 when called from the WSJT-X c++ code and with fsample=12000 when called from the jt9 fortran code. When the “a7” decoding feature was added i

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Memory leak in 2.7.0 rc1?

2023-05-28 Thread Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel
Il 26/05/23 14:12, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel ha scritto: Hi, Just guessing, but for the worked before, depending on what is in the ADI file, they might be allocating memory space for a bit or byte matrix for all possible combination of DX entities, Callsigns by mode and band. That is just a wi

[wsjt-devel] Version 2.7.0-rc1

2023-05-28 Thread jarmo via wsjt-devel
Have had running now for a while, despite operator errors seems good, BUT :), When I choose CQ: NONE, there is no effect, still first/strongest stn fires up qso... Fedora 38, rigctl Hamlib 4.6~git touko 13 15:49:08Z 2023 SHA=99baa8 64-bit, Kenwood TS-890S. Jarmo, oh1mrr